Re: "Shared" procedure division code
- From: "Howard Brazee" <howard@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 13:56:15 GMT
On 3-Aug-2005, docdwarf@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >Still, a suggestion that adding "I believe" to a "is stupid" clause should be
> >accompanied by a statement of purpose - what benefit is gained.
>
> That depends on who is evaluating the benefit, Mr Brazee; some might say
> that more precise speech is, in and of it'sself, a benefit.
Precision isn't measured by the number of words being passed - it's measured by
how effectively the data gets understood. Extra words do not make something
precise unless more information was added. My argument is that no more
information was added.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: "Shared" procedure division code
- From: docdwarf
- Re: "Shared" procedure division code
- References:
- Re: "Shared" procedure division code
- From: Howard Brazee
- Re: "Shared" procedure division code
- From: docdwarf
- Re: "Shared" procedure division code
- From: Howard Brazee
- Re: "Shared" procedure division code
- From: docdwarf
- Re: "Shared" procedure division code
- Prev by Date: Re: Reviving REMARKS
- Next by Date: Re: "Shared" procedure division code
- Previous by thread: Re: "Shared" procedure division code
- Next by thread: Re: "Shared" procedure division code
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|