Re: COMP-? / Extension USAGEs (was: The redefines clause & comp-3
- From: "Howard Brazee" <howard@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 20:42:29 GMT
On 8-Aug-2005, "William M. Klein" <wmklein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Even for USAGE Packed-Decimal and Binary, the Standard doesn't "dictate"
> exactly
> how the data is stored - only what "radix" must be used.
It's amusing that we're supposed to switch from COMP-3 to Packed-Decimal because
it sounds as though it is more standard that way, even though that is a fiction.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: COMP-? / Extension USAGEs (was: The redefines clause & comp-3
- From: William M. Klein
- Re: COMP-? / Extension USAGEs (was: The redefines clause & comp-3
- References:
- The redefines clause & comp-3
- From: ed
- Re: The redefines clause & comp-3
- From: HeyBub
- Re: The redefines clause & comp-3
- From: Walter Murray
- Re: The redefines clause & comp-3
- From: Chuck Stevens
- COMP-? / Extension USAGEs (was: The redefines clause & comp-3
- From: William M. Klein
- The redefines clause & comp-3
- Prev by Date: Re: "Shared" procedure division code
- Next by Date: Re: data conversion
- Previous by thread: COMP-? / Extension USAGEs (was: The redefines clause & comp-3
- Next by thread: Re: COMP-? / Extension USAGEs (was: The redefines clause & comp-3
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|