Re: Authorities
- From: "Pete Dashwood" <dashwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 11:18:21 +1200
"Richard" <riplin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1123705926.849716.295840@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> nobody reading that post would believe that
>> when you said "this is stupid",
>
> Maybe, but some would think that what was said was: "You are stupid
> (for having said/done this)".
>
Yes, I can see that.
But would a reasonable person continue to believe that, long after it was
clarified that no such implication was intended?
(Smart people sometimes do stupid things, etc...)
Pete.
.
- References:
- Re: "Shared" procedure division code
- From: jce
- Re: "Shared" procedure division code
- From: docdwarf
- Re: "Shared" procedure division code
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: "Shared" procedure division code
- From: docdwarf
- Re: "Shared" procedure division code
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: "Shared" procedure division code
- From: Oliver Wong
- Re: "Shared" procedure division code
- From: Pete Dashwood
- OT: Authorities
- From: Howard Brazee
- Re: Authorities
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: Authorities
- From: Chuck Stevens
- Re: Authorities
- From: Howard Brazee
- Re: Authorities
- From: Richard
- Re: "Shared" procedure division code
- Prev by Date: Re: Authorities
- Next by Date: Re: Colour blindness [Was: Re: "Shared" procedure division code]
- Previous by thread: Re: Authorities
- Next by thread: Re: Authorities
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|