Micro Focus vs Fujitsu COBOL



Hi,

I am looking for any information anyone can give me (thanks in
advance). What I'd like to know is if anyone has used Fujitsu to
write multi-threaded Windows applications and what sort of API's were
used (i.e., were they native WinAPI's or Fujitsu supplied calls?).
Also, if anyone can tell me of any direct head-to-head performance
comparisons between app's written & compiled with the two compilers.

Thanks much.

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: String Functions in MF
    ... > It is free for developers to distribute, they get a licence when they ... > buy the product (but not for free compilers). ... I guess I could go and read all the fine print in my Fujitsu License ... COBOL or not). ...
    (comp.lang.cobol)
  • Re: GOBACK (was: Perform Thru/Go to vs. Perform - Compile Speed
    ... >>It has been available on most compilers I've worked on, ... >>affair) and Fujitsu. ... >Mr Wagner, it might be fruitful to consider the difference between 'most ... Being logicians, CLC readers ...
    (comp.lang.cobol)
  • Re: COBOL Compiler for Windows
    ... Cobol, though normally Cobol programs are used in a CICS service. ... but certainly there used to be workstation based CICS packages that would run the programs compiled by workstation compilers. ... different product, such as a preprocessor, that converts the EXEC SQL ... Fujitsu do support ODBC access through a limited set of EXEC SQL ...
    (comp.lang.cobol)
  • Re: New Cobol compiler written in Cobol
    ... Demand has been modest. ... Micro Focus and Fujitsu offer compilers that produce code for the CVM ...
    (comp.lang.cobol)
  • Re: Relais =?iso-8859-1?Q?anschlie=DFen?=
    ... > oben einem waagerechten Strich drauf. ... Fujitsu! ... Gruß Dieter ... Prev by Date: ...
    (de.sci.electronics)