Re: Recursive Call
- From: "Judson McClendon" <judmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 13:41:05 -0600
"Chuck Stevens" <charles.stevens@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Note that within COBOL that is compliant with the three most recent
> standards, both direct and indirect recursion is prohibited. If an
> implementor allows it (or provides additional syntax to support it), it's
> an extension and it does whatever the implementor says it does.
Why in the world would recursion be forbidden? I haven't used it often in
COBOL, but I did find it extremely useful in writing a parts explosion
module once. The code, which was pretty elegant, would have been somewhat
tacky without recursion.
--
Judson McClendon judmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (remove zero)
Sun Valley Systems http://sunvaley.com
"For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that
whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life."
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Recursive Call
- From: Chuck Stevens
- Re: Recursive Call
- References:
- Recursive Call
- From: Paolo
- Re: Recursive Call
- From: Chuck Stevens
- Recursive Call
- Prev by Date: Re: Newsgroup browsers
- Next by Date: Re: Cobol work?
- Previous by thread: Re: Recursive Call
- Next by thread: Re: Recursive Call
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|