Re: Next generation COBOL?
- From: Herwig Huener & Josella Simone Playton <news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 00:06:01 +0100
2005-11-24 23:44:32 MET
Steve Richfie1d wrote:
As a concept, the original COBOL (before they started tacking numbers onto it) was a thing of beauty - where with some skill you could clearly state your methodology in grammatically correct English, that even an untrained secretary could read.
This was, to my mind, a failure - among those merits COBOL admittedly actually has.
Precision does not need many words - it needs clear concepts. Trying to use everyday language for programming is doomed to be a failure - either it is not everyday language, or it does not work.
And then - why should the untrained secretary read programs? In order to understand concepts of commerce and finance, a mind is not "untrained".
An "untrained mind" is someone who cannot form clear and grammatically correct sentences. Such a mind cannot program, in no language, and no application. There is no programming language specially for blondes - and it's certainly not COBOL.
> ...
What is gradually emerging over many projects is a new concept for a distant descendant of COBOL, where things are stated in much higher-level problem-oriented terms and the details of data organization are taken care of by a much smarter execution environment than COBOL ever enjoyed. ...
Well. Maybe. Distant descendant of nowadays computers could even clean my windows. - I doubt that I live to see it.
> Also, it is SO simple that you could write and debug an
interpreter or translator for it in something like BASIC in a week or so, so it should become ubiquitous for many of the things that VBA and Java are now used for, because of its 100% readability even by untrained people.
No. COBOL, even COBOL++, is no substitute for thinking.
Perhaps I am not the only one following this path?
You are not the only one. A former colleague of mine is very fond of AI - and we often have an argument about that.
He always looses - I dare tell you because he does not read this group.
His AI does not tell him to.
Herwig
-- ********************************************************** * http://www.quantenrente.de Josella Simone Playton * * http://www.Josella-Simone-Playton.de Herwig Huener * **********************************************************
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Next generation COBOL?
- From: James J. Gavan
- Re: Next generation COBOL?
- From: Steve Richfie1d
- Re: Next generation COBOL?
- From: Judson McClendon
- Re: Next generation COBOL?
- References:
- Next generation COBOL?
- From: Steve Richfie1d
- Next generation COBOL?
- Prev by Date: Re: Next generation COBOL?
- Next by Date: Re: Next generation COBOL?
- Previous by thread: Re: Next generation COBOL?
- Next by thread: Re: Next generation COBOL?
- Index(es):