Re: Next generation COBOL?
- From: docdwarf@xxxxxxxxx ()
- Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 13:14:32 +0000 (UTC)
In article <dmhbka$d3n$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Herwig Huener <Herwig.Huener@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[snip]
>Another example might be jokes, where the last few words do a
>re-semantic on the entire text of the joke, and of course a set of some
>optimization problems out of which you mentioned the traveling salesman.
Leaving aside the aspects of humor dictated by a given society... for some
reason I now think of a punch-line of 'Norwegian flat-bread? I thought it
was a box of suppositories!'
[snip]
>Always the same message: Nature loves Quantum Computing - but not
>bytes or bits or nands or nors or Intel-processors.
The aphorism I was taught went something like 'The universe is a very
dirty laboratory.'
DD
.
- References:
- Next generation COBOL?
- From: Steve Richfie1d
- Re: Next generation COBOL?
- From: Steve Richfie1d
- Re: Next generation COBOL?
- From: Oliver Wong
- Re: Next generation COBOL?
- From: Herwig Huener
- Next generation COBOL?
- Prev by Date: Re: Next generation COBOL?
- Next by Date: Re: Making money from Java
- Previous by thread: Re: Next generation COBOL?
- Next by thread: Re: Next generation COBOL?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|