Re: Iraq
- From: berlutte@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 15:50:44 -0500
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 01:29:04 +0000 (UTC), docdwarf@xxxxxxxxx () wrote:
>In article <1134239695.595850.127500@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>Alistair <alistair@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>But presumption of innocence until convicted in a court of law does not
>>apply in Guantanamo.
>
>It certainly seems that way, Mr Mclean, and those who have been called
>'decent citizens' have said they consider it to be a blight and a stain
>upon a good nation's escutcheon.
>
>It has been suggested that if one expects perfection in matters in which
>humans are involved one might be disappointed... but it seems that this
>suggestion has not made it to some corners of the globe.
Such a jesuit you are old chicken!
You seem to forget that it is a *continuing* state of affairs.
I would suggest you refrain from infering to your constitution cause
you'll be joining Mr Padilla in the twilight zone.
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/FBIsuspect.html
To quote from Chimp I:
http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_7779.shtml
He will probably become *Sir* Dubya for this.
Bwahaha!
Wily limeys, nay?
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Iraq
- Next by Date: Re: Making money from Java
- Previous by thread: Re: Iraq
- Next by thread: Re: Iraq
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
