OT: religion

On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 19:26:12 -0600, "Judson McClendon"
<judmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>Wow, Oliver, have you been reading these posts? Do you see any *hint* in
>these posts that any of them (or yourself) are even remotely ready to accept
>that the evolutionists, for example, are climbing up the wrong tree? Oh yes,
>*know* is the correct expression, alright. :-)

What evidence would you accept as evidence that evolution is correct?
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Talk.origins unmoderated
    ... I count nine posts from you today, ... I AM speaking of the others banned here for not being evolutionists. ... I call upon the moderator to produce the list of those banned ... So you don't have any real evidence of such banning based on disbelief ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Santa Bill McReynolds
    ... There are so many posts going back ... The movie deal was brought up by ... Ramseys watched any of those movies, let's see some evidence that ... Ramsey was a Promise Keepers member? ...
    (alt.true-crime)
  • Re: Sock Puppet Fun Revisited [was Re: McCall - no guts, no glory; put up or shutup
    ... your posts to know the way this goes. ... The Burden of Proof Principle ... When people ask "what do you mean by compelling evidence?" ... The Acceptability Principle ...
    (soc.history.medieval)
  • Re: My journey through RMB archives
    ... "Yoko tried to murder John" nonsense. ... side and the anti-Yoko (Seaman) side. ... skepticism that he expressed elsewhere in his posts. ... no evidence for any of it whatsoever. ...
    (rec.music.beatles)
  • Re: Clear Proof of Harassment and Libelous Malice
    ... -- Brad Jesness ... BUT there is NO evidence of this: ... > training in psychotherapy, who has lied about having faculty ... > posts from even way, ...
    (sci.psychology.psychotherapy)
Loading