Re: Making money from Java
- From: "Rick Smith" <ricksmith@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 13:35:58 -0500
"Oliver Wong" <owong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:5Hhof.166802$yS6.142470@xxxxxxxxxxx
[snip]
> Then again, I call myself a "computer scientist", but I don't think I
> can call anything I've done in this domain an "experiment". What I do is
> more like pure thinking and reasoning, with no external observations. I
> guess this would put "computer science" not under "science", but rather
> under "mathematics" or perhaps "logic/philosophy"?
The basis for computer science was discussed,
in this newsgroup, a few years ago. The discussion
began with a statement, attributed to Dijkstra, that
computer science was a branch of applied
mathematics. The objection was that it could be
a branch of logic. My position, for what it's worth,
was that computer science could draw from both
and jokingly suggested that, as a river to its
tributaries, both mathematics and logic are
branches of computer science.
A few days after the discussion ended, I found
a statement that Bertrand Russell claimed that
mathematics was a branch of logic.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Making money from Java
- From: Judson McClendon
- Re: Making money from Java
- References:
- Re: Making money from Java
- From: Peter Lacey
- Re: Making money from Java
- From: Richard
- Re: Making money from Java
- From:
- Re: Making money from Java
- From: Oliver Wong
- Re: Making money from Java
- From:
- Re: Making money from Java
- From: Oliver Wong
- Re: Making money from Java
- Prev by Date: Re: Belief in Santa
- Next by Date: Re: Making money from Java
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: Definition of science (WAS: Making money from Java)
- Next by thread: Re: Making money from Java
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|