OT: Apostolic Succession (was Re: making money from Java)
- From: charles.stevens@xxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 15 Dec 2005 11:59:27 -0800
There was already an OT: Religion started elsewhere, so I decided to be
more
specifid.
Bottom posting also:
"James J. Gavan" <jgavandeletethis@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:406of.110903$ki.54011@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Can we do Bill a favour, and at his request switch this to an "OT" ?
> Having personally started "Making Money from Java" - all I got was (1)
> from Donald - Sun Microsystems sue the rest of the world and (2) some
> useful URLs from Stephen Gennard :-)
>
> Now a bottom posting :-
>
> Chuck Stevens wrote:
>> "Richard" <riplin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:1134588070.599409.158760@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>>>You are mistaken. While the first Popes were assigned (by the Roman
>>>Emperor) to have control over the roman church of the time
>>
>>
>> At the time of Constantine's establishment of Christianity as the
>> official religion of the Roman Empire, there was but one organized church
>> (with the occasional heretic group).
>>
>>
>>>there has
>>>been considerable diversity since then,
>>
>>
>> Two big splits: the schism of 1054, in which Pope Leo IX and Patriarch
>> Michael 1 excommunicated each other, and the Protestant Reformation begun
>> with Luther. The question is whether you regard the doctrinal
>> differences between, say, Mennonites and Amish, or "high-church"
>> Lutherans and Anglicans, as being significant.
>>
>> A side note: I was taught before Vatican II that the Roman Catholic
>> Church accepts (begrudgingly) that the Church of England (and by
>> extension some Episcopalian groups in the US), some Lutheran groups, and
>> so far as I know all of Orthodoxy has *retained* the apostolic succession
>> and thus the sacraments performed by those clergy that are within that
>> "bloodline" are entirely valid.
>>
>> -Chuck Stevens
>
> Yep I recognize Chuck's word 'begrudgingly' - depends who taught him.
>
> So the priesthood in Catholicism, "Once a priest always a priest". A
> seminarian studies and as a deacon in due course will prostrate himself in
> front of an altar before a bishop. The ritual involves the 'laying of
> hands' or passing on of the Holy Spirit - the deacon is now a consecrated
> priest.
>
> The Seven Sacraments, (of Catholicism) are Baptism, Penance/Confession,
> Holy Eucharist/Communion, Confirmation, Matrimony, Holy Orders and Extreme
> Unction; the latter being a ritual of anointing a dying person with oils -
> which you sometimes see in war movies where a chaplain is praying with a
> dying soldier. Priesthood comes in as #6, Holy Orders.
>
> So back to Chuck's comments - and let's just stick with Merrie Old Tudor
> England. The hierarchy, bishops, priests etc., were all ordained Catholic
> priests. So when there was the split with Rome and Thomas Cranmer was made
> Archbishop of Canterbury he automatically qualified as being an ordained
> Catholic priest - "Once a priest, always a priest". Therefore he was able
> to logically pass on the priesthood to fellow Protestants.
>
> The idea didn't sit well with a lot of catholic clergy, nor for that
> matter some of the Anglican clergy. However today any open-minded catholic
> theologian would admit to the principle. Similarly, many knowledgeable
> Anglican clerics are aware of the same loophole.
>
> Jimmy
My recollection is that a *priest* is allowed to perform all the
sacraments
*except Holy Orders*. That one requires a *bishop*.
Cranmer was ordained a priest; it's not clear that he was in the
meantime
ordained a *bishop*. Whether his subsequent ordinations as Archbishop
of
Canterbury are meaningful or not depends on whether a "real" bishop
ordained
him *as a bishop* (if not before, then at Canterbury). It is only
after the
officiant's ordination *as bishop* that the Church holds the
ordinations he
performs as valid.
Since the Roman Catholic Church *does* appear to accept that the
Apostolic
Succession has been maintained in the Church of England, my guess is
that
they're satisfied that he was indeed ordained *as a bishop* by a "real"
bishop.
-Chuck Stevens
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: Apostolic Succession (was Re: making money from Java)
- From: James J. Gavan
- Re: OT: Apostolic Succession (was Re: making money from Java)
- Prev by Date: Re: Making money from Java
- Next by Date: Re: Making money from Java
- Previous by thread: Earley Parser for OO-COBOL?
- Next by thread: Re: OT: Apostolic Succession (was Re: making money from Java)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|