Re: Making money from Java


Judson McClendon wrote:
> "Alistair" <alistair@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Judson McClendon wrote:
> >> "Oliver Wong" <owong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > "Judson McClendon" <judmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >> I believe
> >> >> such is the case with the ubiquitous Polonium halos in granite appear
> >> >> to
> >> >> be a kind of 'Divine Signature' of instantaneous creation. I believe
> >> >> the
> >> >> same thing about the so-called "Bible Codes". The only thing you can
> >> >> deduce from them is that it took God to put them there.
> >
> > There are Geologic arrangements of pebbles which have naturally formed
> > rings. Are these indisputable proof of god? I've switched to the lower
> > case g because I feel that your wilful ignorance deserves punishment.
>
> Ouch! ;-)
>
> >> I follow your logic, but it is based on a false definition: your
> >> definition
> >> of 'infallible' does not necessarily match God's definition. It is pretty
> >> clear to me, from much study of the Bible, that God's definition of
> >> "perfect"
> >
> > Who was it who said that he could not even begin to understand god and
> > yet here you are presuming to interpret the bible for the rest of us
> > AND claiming to have more than a passingknowledge of gods' meaning!
>
>
> I said finite man cannot understand infinite God *without God's help*. The
> Bible is quite a lot of help. :-)
>
> None of us have perfect understanding of programming, yet we share our
> knowledge, imperfect as it is. What's the Big Deal on offering one's
> Biblical knowledge under the same conditions?
> --

It seems to me that the bible is of little or no real help, bearing in
mind all of the posts discussing the nuances of interpretation that
have appeared in this thread.

.

Relevant Pages