Re: religion

"Howard Brazee" <howard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "Judson McClendon" <judmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>Wow, Oliver, have you been reading these posts? Do you see any *hint* in
>>these posts that any of them (or yourself) are even remotely ready to
>>accept
>>that the evolutionists, for example, are climbing up the wrong tree? Oh
>>yes,
>>*know* is the correct expression, alright. :-)
>
> What evidence would you accept as evidence that evolution is correct?

Well, I have already logically proven that, if Biblical Creation is correct,
then any possible physical evidence is useless as a proof. However, for man
to set up an experiment whereby lifeless dirt formed, all on its own, into
living cells would go a long way toward convincing me the idea is not an
outrageous impossibility. :-) Remember, even if man created a living cell in
a lab through some process, then you still have life being created by
intelligence, not life forming all by itself, which is what evolution
presupposes. :-)

After that, then a good description of how things like a human eye or
bisexual reproduction could evolve would be necessary. The problem is not
simply the complexity of those things, it is the fact that they would have
no survival value (perhaps even the reverse) until virtually complete,
therefore removing any basis for natural selection to work and cause the
structure to evolve.

Then, as a final touch, explain how love and art and beauty (or sense of
these things) could evolve. An evolutionary process might come up with lust,
but why love? Why artistic sense? Why musical sense? In a purely
evolutionary context, these things make no sense at all. Even if having them
could be shown to have survival value, they would only work *after* they
were completely evolved and functional, so that art and music were actually
produced. Not very logical.
--
Judson McClendon judmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (remove zero)
Sun Valley Systems http://sunvaley.com
"For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that
whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life."


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Darwinian Mechanism of Mutation and Natural Selection Found Lacking
    ... The conclusions are that life could ... The evidence for evolution is broken down into three broad ... The first is direct evidence of small-scale changes in controlled ... types of fossils associated with only certain other fossils. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Sean loses interest
    ... please do present your evidence. ... written on to make it into real life testing much less demonstration. ... radiometric measures of the age of the universe and extrapolations ... of stellar and planetary evolution. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Darwinian Mechanism of Mutation and Natural Selection Found Lacking
    ... The conclusions are that life could ... The evidence for evolution is broken down into three broad ... The first is direct evidence of small-scale changes in controlled ... there are Precambrian multicellular fossils, ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: I have another argument that needs refuting
    ... God destroyed all of life on earth except for Noah, his family, and the ... Evolution states that everything in the universe came from nothing ... do is study the evidence and see which religion makes the most sense. ... No. Tee geologic timetable proves the great age of the earth. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Sean loses interest
    ... If I'm so ignorant produce a real life example that goes beyond just- ... please do present your evidence. ... earth without being to point to any evidence of its age, ... stellar and planetary evolution. ...
    (talk.origins)
Loading