Re: religion

On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 21:20:16 -0600, "Judson McClendon"
<judmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> What evidence would you accept as evidence that evolution is correct?
>
>Well, I have already logically proven that, if Biblical Creation is correct,
>then any possible physical evidence is useless as a proof. However, for man
>to set up an experiment whereby lifeless dirt formed, all on its own, into
>living cells would go a long way toward convincing me the idea is not an
>outrageous impossibility. :-)

That's not evolution.

> Remember, even if man created a living cell in
>a lab through some process, then you still have life being created by
>intelligence, not life forming all by itself, which is what evolution
>presupposes. :-)

That's covering your *** to give you a chance to back out.
.

Loading