Zero supression and tinyCobol
- From: John Culleton <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 14:28:08 -0500
Apparently in Tiny COBOL when one displays a pic 9 field at a specific
location it is displayed as if it were defined as pic z. IMO this is
obviously wrong, but does the ANS standard address this issue?
--
John Culleton
Able Indexers and Typesetters
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Zero supression and tinyCobol
- From: Howard Brazee
- Re: Zero supression and tinyCobol
- From: Rick Smith
- Re: Zero supression and tinyCobol
- From: Rick Smith
- Re: Zero supression and tinyCobol
- Prev by Date: Re: Making money from Java
- Next by Date: Re: OT: Agnoticism (WAS: Making money from Java)
- Previous by thread: [OT] At This Time of Year
- Next by thread: Re: Zero supression and tinyCobol
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|