Re: Zero supression and tinyCobol



On Mon, 26 Dec 2005 14:28:08 -0500, John Culleton
<john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>Apparently in Tiny COBOL when one displays a pic 9 field at a specific
>location it is displayed as if it were defined as pic z. IMO this is
>obviously wrong, but does the ANS standard address this issue?

I'm not familiar with Tiny CoBOL, but I have used some versions of
CoBOL that required special manipulations when displaying data in a
meaningful manner. Check to see if your DISPLAY command has options
or further documentation.
.



Relevant Pages

  • Zero supression and tinyCobol
    ... Apparently in Tiny COBOL when one displays a pic 9 field at a specific ... IMO this is ... Able Indexers and Typesetters ... Prev by Date: ...
    (comp.lang.cobol)
  • Re: Zero supression and tinyCobol
    ... but does the ANS standard address this issue? ... My previous answer addressed the ISO/ANSI COBOL ... ISO/ANSI have a DISPLAY statement for displaying ... implementor extension or implementor-defined, it would ...
    (comp.lang.cobol)