Re: Cobol fo Unix
- From: "Sergey Kashyrin" <ska@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 23:34:06 -0500
Michael,
If you don't need object cobol, check opencobol.org.
Soon will be working on solaris-64bit, aix5.3-64bit and hpux11.11-64bit
My understanding that it's already working on linux
SQL should be covered by preprocessors. At least working with Oracle, UDB
and Sybase.
Regards,
Sergey
"Michael Russell" <Michael.Russell@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:43ae7eb7$0$27881$ed9e5944@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Hi,
>
> Anyone like to volunteer info on what they think is the least expensive
> Cobol for Unix?
> This is as regards run-time licences - a confusing area, I know!
>
> If we take Micro Focus as 'the benchmark Cobol', for functionality,
> then 'least expensive' shouldn't mean seriously less functionality when
> compared with MF.
>
> (Except - I'm not bothered about availability of SQL (odd, I know))
>
> Happy Christmas-time!
>
> Michael
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cobol fo Unix
- From: Michael Russell
- Re: Cobol fo Unix
- References:
- Cobol fo Unix
- From: Michael Russell
- Cobol fo Unix
- Prev by Date: Re: To my Democratic & Republican friends (with tongue firmly planted in cheek)
- Next by Date: Re: religion
- Previous by thread: Re: Cobol fo Unix
- Next by thread: Re: Cobol fo Unix
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|