Re: Cobol fo Unix



Michael,

If you don't need object cobol, check opencobol.org.
Soon will be working on solaris-64bit, aix5.3-64bit and hpux11.11-64bit
My understanding that it's already working on linux
SQL should be covered by preprocessors. At least working with Oracle, UDB
and Sybase.

Regards,
Sergey

"Michael Russell" <Michael.Russell@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:43ae7eb7$0$27881$ed9e5944@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Hi,
>
> Anyone like to volunteer info on what they think is the least expensive
> Cobol for Unix?
> This is as regards run-time licences - a confusing area, I know!
>
> If we take Micro Focus as 'the benchmark Cobol', for functionality,
> then 'least expensive' shouldn't mean seriously less functionality when
> compared with MF.
>
> (Except - I'm not bothered about availability of SQL (odd, I know))
>
> Happy Christmas-time!
>
> Michael
>


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Regular Expressions and Standard COBOL (was Re: Use of Class conditions in COBOL)
    ... I think it is useful to have Regular Expressions ... made part of the COBOL language standard. ... standard (indeed, any programming language standard) ... there is functionality that is implementor-defined; ...
    (comp.lang.cobol)
  • Re: Regular Expressions and Standard COBOL (was Re: Use of Class conditions in COBOL)
    ... I think it is useful to have Regular Expressions ... made part of the COBOL language standard. ... standard (indeed, any programming language standard) ... there is functionality that is implementor-defined; ...
    (comp.lang.cobol)
  • Re: Why COBOL is losing the POWER struggle
    ... simply more concise and more powerful than COBOL. ... Was extremely hard to get into his dumb head that those languages HAD ... Now I focus on functionality. ... BMS back in the late '70s, using mainframe COBOL and green 3270 screens. ...
    (comp.lang.cobol)
  • Re: COBOL and Java Relative Perceived Power
    ... What does COBOL ... Questions about one language being "better" than another are becoming less ... I am also an isCOBOL user; switched from Acucobol about 18 months ... And I totally agree with your comment about functionality. ...
    (comp.lang.cobol)
  • Re: In answer to RW - again (was: Sorts (revised)
    ... So too does SP2. ... > Now that Cobol supports OO, an application program could invoke COM directly. ... COBOL is "extending functionality the same way that OO does"? ... Comparing an OO 3rd party class system would be reasonable to compare to the sp2 ...
    (comp.lang.cobol)