Re: GoTo in Java
- From: mwojcik@xxxxxxxxxxx (Michael Wojcik)
- Date: 20 Jan 2006 19:04:46 GMT
In article <dqoui8$1pkl$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Chuck Stevens" <charles.stevens@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> If you're restricting "labelled EXIT PERFORM" to *inline* PERFORM
> statements, it seems to me that the distinction between a "labelled" PERFORM
> and an "unlabelled" PERFORM is precisely that the former has at least one
> label, and that in turn identifies it as an *out-of-line* PERFORM, whereas
> the "in-line" PERFORM does NOT have a label.
"Labelled EXIT PERFORM", as I described it, would have to include new
syntax for labelling inline PERFORM.
Note that I'm not actually advocating this addition to the language,
just noting how it could be done in a manner equivalent to what Java
has.
--
Michael Wojcik michael.wojcik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
She felt increasingly (vision or nightmare?) that, though people are
important, the relations between them are not, and that in particular
too much fuss has been made over marriage; centuries of carnal
embracement, yet man is no nearer to understanding man. -- E M Forster
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: GoTo in Java
- From: Richard
- Re: GoTo in Java
- From: Chuck Stevens
- Re: GoTo in Java
- References:
- GoTo in Java
- From: Howard Brazee
- Re: GoTo in Java
- From: Peter Lacey
- Re: GoTo in Java
- From: Howard Brazee
- Re: GoTo in Java
- From: Tiberiu Gociu
- Re: GoTo in Java
- From: Howard Brazee
- Re: GoTo in Java
- From: Chuck Stevens
- Re: GoTo in Java
- From: Michael Wojcik
- Re: GoTo in Java
- From: Chuck Stevens
- GoTo in Java
- Prev by Date: Re: [experiences] Fujitsu NetCOBOL for .NET
- Next by Date: Re: Fujitsu NetCOBOL for .NET
- Previous by thread: Re: GoTo in Java
- Next by thread: Re: GoTo in Java
- Index(es):