Re: GoTo in Java
- From: "Oliver Wong" <owong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 16:52:53 GMT
"Frank Swarbrick" <Frank.Swarbrick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:43qn0fF1oqu69U1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[quotation got mangled on my side, so I snipped it]
>
> Now that sounds really cool! It would be cool even without the "reverse
> compile" to a different language. Really, if there was a linkage
> convention
> standard and name-mangling standard it seems to me that a library written
> in
> any language should be accessible from any other language. Of course the
> documentation might be hell:
>
> Example C Code:
> Example C++ Code:
> Example Java Code:
> Example COBOL Code:
> Example Fortran Code:
> Example Python Code:
> Example Perl Code:
>
If you had the "reverse compile to different language" feature, you
could have the example written once, and then reverse compile it.
- Oliver
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: GoTo in Java
- From: Richard
- Re: GoTo in Java
- References:
- GoTo in Java
- From: Howard Brazee
- Re: GoTo in Java
- From: Richard
- Re: GoTo in Java
- From: Michael Wojcik
- Re: GoTo in Java
- From: Oliver Wong
- Re: GoTo in Java
- From: Frank Swarbrick
- GoTo in Java
- Prev by Date: Re: GoTo in Java
- Next by Date: Re: GoTo in Java
- Previous by thread: Re: GoTo in Java
- Next by thread: Re: GoTo in Java
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|