Re: cobol code assessment
- From: Christopher Pomasl <pomasl-NOSpam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 21:40:34 -0700
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 21:22:54 -0700, Christopher Pomasl wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 07:27:08 -0800, Alistair wrote:
>>
>
> Ideally, then I want one person with ten years, one with 5 and any number
> of a team with 2 or less.
>
> Chris
BTW, It also depends on the project size, but I have a product with about
600 COBOL programs +30 ASM and Ideally it should have the team described
above to upgrade against the changing environment(s) under which it must
run. I am the sole developer and maintainer.
Product requires OS390, Z/os, CICS, TSO, SPF, IMS, DB2, +other MVS
utilities and subsystems. And must support all current versions.
I could do a lot more with a larger team, but I get by with just myself.
Chris
22 years COBOL
20 years 360 assembler
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: cobol code assessment
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: cobol code assessment
- References:
- cobol code assessment
- From: apple.time@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: cobol code assessment
- From: Alistair
- Re: cobol code assessment
- From: HeyBub
- Re: cobol code assessment
- From: Louis Krupp
- Re: cobol code assessment
- From: Alistair
- Re: cobol code assessment
- From: Christopher Pomasl
- cobol code assessment
- Prev by Date: Re: cobol code assessment
- Next by Date: Re: cobol code assessment
- Previous by thread: Re: cobol code assessment
- Next by thread: Re: cobol code assessment
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|