Re: cobol code assessment
- From: Frederico Fonseca <real-email-in-msg-spam@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 08:29:38 +0000
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 02:01:05 +0000 (UTC), docdwarf@xxxxxxxxx () wrote:
>In article <1138548428.909665.291230@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>Alistair <alistair@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>[snip]
>
>>So five people with two years experience each would definitely be
>>better than one person with ten years experience.
>
>Perhaps, Mr Maclean, in the same way that nine women can gestate a zygote
>to full term in a single month?
>
>>Of course, DD would
>>posit that, like a good wine, he improves with age.
>
>Hmmmmm... leaving aside matters of taste I can say that with age I do not
>make the same old mistakes... I manage to make newer mistakes that seem to
>be more difficult to find.
hummmm ..... could we also argue that a common age memory overload
problem is taking its toll and making them look like they are harder
to find now... :>)
Frederico Fonseca
ema il: frederico_fonseca at syssoft-int.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- cobol code assessment
- From: apple.time@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: cobol code assessment
- From: HeyBub
- Re: cobol code assessment
- From: Louis Krupp
- Re: cobol code assessment
- From: Alistair
- Re: cobol code assessment
- From:
- cobol code assessment
- Prev by Date: Re: cobol code assessment
- Next by Date: Re: PowerCobol
- Previous by thread: Re: cobol code assessment
- Next by thread: Re: cobol code assessment
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|