Re: GoTo in Java
- From: mwojcik@xxxxxxxxxxx (Michael Wojcik)
- Date: 30 Jan 2006 18:16:01 GMT
In article <0lsCf.112291$m05.1772@clgrps12>, "Oliver Wong" <owong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> To prevent 20 page documentation for a 20 line block of code, the
> comments could themselves be structured (perhaps via XML?) so you could
> instruct your IDE to filter out the parts that are not relevant to you.
Now you're getting into the realm of Literate Programming, which I
think is probably the direction you ought to go with this idea.
Understanding the intent of programs is a task for humans, not
software; so give it to the author, and not to a decompiler. That's
not to say that decompilers couldn't assist with the sort of multiple-
language representation you're describing, but I think most of the
tooling would be on the front side, where the programmer is.
I think Literate Programming has a lot going for it, actually, but
the development environments (and not just IDEs - we don't all like
IDEs) need work.
--
Michael Wojcik michael.wojcik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Warning: may contain traces of nuts.
-- Adapted from a sig line used by Walter Roberson
.
- References:
- GoTo in Java
- From: Howard Brazee
- Re: GoTo in Java
- From: Oliver Wong
- Re: GoTo in Java
- From: Frank Swarbrick
- Re: GoTo in Java
- From: Oliver Wong
- Re: GoTo in Java
- From: Richard
- Re: GoTo in Java
- From: Oliver Wong
- GoTo in Java
- Prev by Date: Re: GoTo in Java
- Next by Date: OT but possibly important: shelf life of CD's
- Previous by thread: Re: GoTo in Java
- Next by thread: Re: GoTo in Java
- Index(es):