Re: Disassembler

Pete Dashwood wrote:

This is not your typical disassembler. ["DisASSEMBLER" is probably a
misleading term.] If you look carefully, you will see that the patent
owner is Source Recovery Company. They turn executable code into
_COBOL_source_. That's a simplified description. They also will use your
variable names in the generated source if you provide record definitions.

Why would you need to disassemble something you have the source to? If you
have the source fo the record definitions it is reasonable to suppose you
have the source of the programs...? Am I missing something here?

Pete.


I find it very easy to imagine that the source for a program is lost
whereas the copy books for the files still exist, either in the copy
libs or as listings. As copy books usually apply to more than one
program it's more likely that they'll be looked after more carefully. I
haven't done it myself but I have had dealings with several sites who
were running productions programs for which they'd lost the source.
Heads rolled, naturally, and there was frantic reverse-engineering. One
place I know of had it happen more than once!

Usually, as I recall, it had happened because someone left a backup or a
save or some scheduled task until tomorrow but then had forgotten about
it by tomorrow. And in one case backups hade been scrupulously done but
the JCL stream was in error and the tapes didn't actually get written
on!

PL
.