Re: Disassembler
- From: Howard Brazee <howard@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 10:30:01 -0700
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 11:00:10 -0600, Peter Lacey <lacey@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Don't start that again! It isn't every shop that has the luxury of no
inherited programs. Are you also saying that compiled objects never get
lost?????
We're moving towards a Java environment for much of our code. I went
to modify a method and first did a search to determine where the code
was copied - and found 161 copies of a file which I had created, which
was copied by the trunk and branches and a bunch of places that I
don't get. I'm told not to worry about it, but that's hard from my
background.
The code in these are not all the same.
Vernor Vinge has a SF novel which includes people working as software
archeologists, digging down through systems trying to clean up
thousands of years of interactions.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Disassembler
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: Disassembler
- From: Oliver Wong
- Re: Disassembler
- References:
- Disassembler
- From: Alistair
- Re: Disassembler
- From: CG
- Re: Disassembler
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: Disassembler
- From: Peter Lacey
- Re: Disassembler
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: Disassembler
- From: Peter Lacey
- Disassembler
- Prev by Date: Re: Disassembler
- Next by Date: debugging
- Previous by thread: Re: Disassembler
- Next by thread: Re: Disassembler
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|