Re: Disassembler
- From: CG <carl.gehr.RemoveThis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 13:59:32 -0500
ozzy.kopec@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Pete Dashwood wrote:But, this tool/service would have accomplished the same thing mechanically... That is the point. Now, if the HD contained both the executable and the source, listings are nice to have. In most cases, I do not trust listings unless they can be guaranteed to be the last listing by matching them with the executable. This is especially true if your listing does not have the option turned on to list the compiler options used. Different compiler options, even with the same source code can produce different results.Why would you need to disassemble something you have the source to? If youHad a bud who's boss had them print out the source for every COBOL
have the source fo the record definitions it is reasonable to suppose you
have the source of the programs...? Am I missing something here?
Pete.
program they had. They did incremental and full backups, but sure
enough after a hard drive crash they were missing a few programs. The
secretary hand entered the code from the printed listings so for once a
boss had a good idea :0)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Disassembler
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: Disassembler
- References:
- Disassembler
- From: Alistair
- Re: Disassembler
- From: CG
- Re: Disassembler
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: Disassembler
- From: ozzy . kopec
- Disassembler
- Prev by Date: Re: Disassembler
- Next by Date: Re: Disassembler
- Previous by thread: Re: Disassembler
- Next by thread: Re: Disassembler
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
