Re: Disassembler
- From: "Oliver Wong" <owong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 19:17:50 GMT
"CG" <carl.gehr.RemoveThis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:b890d$44034ace$453db2dd$13218@xxxxxxxxxxx
Again, I think you are missing the point of this... There is NO ASSEMBLER involved. The process goes from MACHINE INSTRUCTIONS to COBOL SOURCE CODE. No need for the customer/user/programmer to have any knowledge of Assembler at all.
If you prefer, call it a DisCOBOLER instead of a DisASSEMBLER.
I think the term traditionally used is "decompiler".
- Oliver
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Disassembler
- From: CG
- Re: Disassembler
- References:
- Disassembler
- From: Alistair
- Re: Disassembler
- From: CG
- Re: Disassembler
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: Disassembler
- From: Peter Lacey
- Re: Disassembler
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: Disassembler
- From: CG
- Disassembler
- Prev by Date: Re: Disassembler
- Next by Date: Re: Disassembler
- Previous by thread: Re: Disassembler
- Next by thread: Re: Disassembler
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|