Re: Disassembler
- From: Howard Brazee <howard@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 12:59:26 -0700
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 14:24:13 -0500, CG
<carl.gehr.RemoveThis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If you prefer, call it a DisCOBOLER instead of a DisASSEMBLER.
I think the term traditionally used is "decompiler".
Yeh! I thought about that, but Pete seemed so hung up on the specific
language, that seemed more to the point.
I suppose you could decompile code into just about any language you
want. The more optimized the code, the more useless the decompiled
results.
.
- References:
- Disassembler
- From: Alistair
- Re: Disassembler
- From: CG
- Re: Disassembler
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: Disassembler
- From: Peter Lacey
- Re: Disassembler
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: Disassembler
- From: CG
- Re: Disassembler
- From: Oliver Wong
- Re: Disassembler
- From: CG
- Disassembler
- Prev by Date: Re: dubbuging that script
- Next by Date: Re: debugging
- Previous by thread: Re: Disassembler
- Next by thread: Re: Disassembler
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|