Re: Disassembler
- From: "Pete Dashwood" <dashwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 00:51:45 +1300
"Howard Brazee" <howard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:lhd602hs3ie1rgrfbp0js4vm4kd13q0n9h@xxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 11:00:10 -0600, Peter Lacey <lacey@xxxxxxx> wrote:I agree, and like you, I'd be worryig about it too. It would appaear some
Don't start that again! It isn't every shop that has the luxury of no
inherited programs. Are you also saying that compiled objects never get
lost?????
We're moving towards a Java environment for much of our code. I went
to modify a method and first did a search to determine where the code
was copied - and found 161 copies of a file which I had created, which
was copied by the trunk and branches and a bunch of places that I
don't get. I'm told not to worry about it, but that's hard from my
background.
severe source control is required.
The code in these are not all the same.I'd like to read that! :-)
Vernor Vinge has a SF novel which includes people working as software
archeologists, digging down through systems trying to clean up
thousands of years of interactions.
Pete.
.
- References:
- Disassembler
- From: Alistair
- Re: Disassembler
- From: CG
- Re: Disassembler
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: Disassembler
- From: Peter Lacey
- Re: Disassembler
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: Disassembler
- From: Peter Lacey
- Re: Disassembler
- From: Howard Brazee
- Disassembler
- Prev by Date: Re: Disassembler
- Next by Date: Re: Disassembler
- Previous by thread: Re: Disassembler
- Next by thread: Re: Disassembler
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|