Re: Disassembler
- From: Howard Brazee <howard@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 07:25:36 -0700
On Wed, 1 Mar 2006 00:48:25 +1300, "Pete Dashwood"
<dashwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I agree. That's why I'm advocating NOT mantaining source code. It is a
highly error prone process that causes more harm than it heals...
So when you have a big billing program and need to adjust an address
being used, you start the requirement gathering to replace the
program...
Or maybe just patch the object code...
8^)
.
- References:
- Disassembler
- From: Alistair
- Re: Disassembler
- From: CG
- Re: Disassembler
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: Disassembler
- From: Peter Lacey
- Re: Disassembler
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: Disassembler
- From: Peter Lacey
- Re: Disassembler
- From: Michael Mattias
- Re: Disassembler
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Disassembler
- Prev by Date: Re: dubbuging that script
- Next by Date: Re: Disassembler
- Previous by thread: Re: Disassembler
- Next by thread: Re: Disassembler
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|