comp.lang.cobol

• Thread Index

---

• Jesus breaking the law was Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Clark Morris
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: "Philosphical" question on "succesful" file status testing
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: "Philosphical" question on "succesful" file status testing
  • From: Last Boy Scout
• Re: WBC and one state's response
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: IBM file status 97 (was: Prodcuing an output file onlyonFriday?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: "Philosphical" question on "succesful" file status testing
  • From:
• Re: How to accept multiple lines of Instream data.
  • From:
• Re: IBM file status 97 (was: Prodcuing an output file onlyonFriday?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• "Philosphical" question on "succesful" file status testing
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: jcl sort question
  • From: slade2
• Re: How to accept multiple lines of Instream data.
  • From: slade2
• Re: How to accept multiple lines of Instream data.
  • From:
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: How to accept multiple lines of Instream data.
  • From: arrbee
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: [OT] WBC and one state's response
  • From:
• Re: [OT] WBC and one state's response
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: LX-i
• Re: IBM file status 97 (was: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: Richard
• Re: IBM file status 97 (was: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: Ron S
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: Jeff Campbell
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: WBC and one state's response
  • From: Alistair
• Re: IBM file status 97 (was: Prodcuing an output file only onFriday?
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: IBM file status 97 (was: Prodcuing an output file only onFriday?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: IBM file status 97 (was: Prodcuing an output file only onFriday?
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: Beautify code
  • From: Steve Rainbird
• Re: Flexible standards in law and in CoBOL
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Flexible standards in law and in CoBOL
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: The "A" word (was RE: Any comments (The "A" Word ...)...)
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Beautify code
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: IBM file status 97 (was: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Retiring a job from CA-7.
  • From: Clark Morris
• Flexible standards in law and in CoBOL
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Beautify code
  • From: void * clvrmnky()
• Re: [OT] WBC and one state's response
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] WBC Nutjob
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: [OT] WBC Nutjob
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: IBM file status 97 (was: Prodcuing an output file only onFriday?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] WBC Nutjob
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] WBC and one state's response
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] WBC Nutjob
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Beautify code
  • From: Steve Rainbird
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Joseph Katnic
• Problem using java with cobol
  • From: awosy
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: Beautify code
  • From: Steve Rainbird
• Re: Beautify code
  • From: Steve Rainbird
• Re: Beautify code
  • From: Steve Rainbird
• Re: Retiring a job from CA-7.
  • From: Hugh Candlin
• Re: Retiring a job from CA-7.
  • From: arrbee
• Re: Retiring a job from CA-7.
  • From: Arnold Trembley
• Re: Beautify code
  • From: Colin Campbell
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Richard
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Richard
• Re: [OT] WBC and one state's response
  • From:
• Re: [OT] WBC Nutjob
  • From:
• Re: Beautify code
  • From: void * clvrmnky()
• Re: Beautify code
  • From: Steve Rainbird
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: Peter Lacey
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: Binyamin Dissen
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: [OT] WBC and one state's response
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• [OT] WBC and one state's response
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Richard
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Richard
• Re: [OT] WBC Nutjob
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Richard
• Re: Beautify code
  • From: hcmason
• Re: How to accept multiple lines of Instream data.
  • From: hcmason
• Re: Make of it what you will ... (Part 2)
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Richard
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: Richard
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: Clark Morris
• Re: Beautify code
  • From: void * clvrmnky()
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: IBM file status 97 (was: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From:
• Re: IBM file status 97 (was: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: IBM file status 97 (was: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Specifying a tablename for a relative file in AcuODBC
  • From: robwcruz@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: Value of variables in programs after first call
  • From: Brian
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: How to accept multiple lines of Instream data.
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: How to accept multiple lines of Instream data.
  • From: arrbee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Beautify code
  • From: Steve Rainbird
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How to accept multiple lines of Instream data.
  • From:
• Re: Retiring a job from CA-7.
  • From:
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From:
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From:
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Joseph Katnic
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: ROSCOE tutorial needed
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: IBM file status 97 (was: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: How to accept multiple lines of Instream data.
  • From: arrbee
• Re: Retiring a job from CA-7.
  • From: arrbee
• Re: Retiring a job from CA-7.
  • From:
• Re: How to accept multiple lines of Instream data.
  • From:
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: Binyamin Dissen
• Retiring a job from CA-7.
  • From: arrbee
• How to accept multiple lines of Instream data.
  • From: arrbee
• Re: IBM file status 97 (was: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: Richard
• Re: Value of variables in programs after first call
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: IBM file status 97 (was: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: Ron S
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: Last Boy Scout
• Re: Value of variables in programs after first call
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Richard
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: Value of variables in programs after first call
  • From: Richard
• Re: OT: Value
  • From: Richard
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: Richard
• Re: CA in The News (again)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Value of variables in programs after first call
  • From: Brian
• Value of variables in programs after first call
  • From: Brian
• Mainframe Developer needed
  • From: iTRS.Net, Inc.
• Re: Value
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: Peter Lacey
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• OT: Value
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Richard
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: Richard
• Re: Specifying a tablename for a relative file in AcuODBC
  • From: sgbojo
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: William M. Klein
• XmlHttpRequest
  • From: Darwood
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: Richard
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Richard
• Fujitsu Debug
  • From: JIH
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Holly
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From:
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From:
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Specifying a tablename for a relative file in AcuODBC
  • From: robwcruz@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From:
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Joseph Katnic
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• IBM file status 97 (was: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: Problems installing MF Workbench 4.0 on WinXP
  • From: Ron S
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Holly
• Re: compilation error.
  • From: William M. Klein
• Windows development for "iSeries" (OS/400, whatever)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: hcmason
• Re: compilation error.
  • From: Colin Campbell
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Richard
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: Richard
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Richard
• Re: Make of it what you will ... (Part 4)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Richard
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Richard
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: Richard
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: Peter Lacey
• Re: Make of it what you will ... (Part 4)
  • From:
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Make of it what you will ... (Part 4)
  • From: Herwig Huener
• Re: Make of it what you will ... (Part 4)
  • From: Herwig Huener
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Problems installing MF Workbench 4.0 on WinXP
  • From: DhS.
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: ROSCOE tutorial needed
  • From: Alistair
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From:
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From:
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: arrbee
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: compilation error.
  • From: arrbee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Holly
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: Arnold Trembley
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: Arnold Trembley
• OT Applicability of laws to children in Canada was Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Clark Morris
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: LX-i
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From:
• Re: ROSCOE tutorial needed
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Make of it what you will ... (Part 4)
  • From:
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Cobol Editor For Windows
  • From: steven . boothe
• Re: Make of it what you will ... (Part 4)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: Peter Lacey
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: compilation error.
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: ROSCOE tutorial needed
  • From: Alistair
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: Make of it what you will ... (Part 4)
  • From: Herwig Huener
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: compilation error.
  • From: epc8
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: compilation error.
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: compilation error.
  • From: epc8
• Re: compilation error.
  • From: Rick Smith
• compilation error.
  • From: arrbee
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: arrbee
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: arrbee
• Re: Locating Bernard Pinon
  • From: Hugh Candlin
• Re: Mainframe Developer-Contract 12 months (Columbia, SC)
  • From: totalstranger
• Re: Mainframe Developer-Contract 12 months (Columbia, SC)
  • From: totalstranger
• Re: ROSCOE tutorial needed
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: ROSCOE tutorial needed
  • From:
• Re: Fujitsu 6.1 CGI/ISAPI CALLS
  • From: Richard
• Re: ROSCOE tutorial needed
  • From: Arnold Trembley
• Locating Bernard Pinon
  • From: mads_lindstroem
• Re: ROSCOE tutorial needed
  • From: Alistair
• Re: ROSCOE tutorial needed
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Fujitsu 6.1 CGI/ISAPI CALLS
  • From: jh
• Re: ROSCOE tutorial needed
  • From:
• Re: ROSCOE tutorial needed
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: C# Learning Resources
  • From: Bruce Wood
• Re: ROSCOE tutorial needed
  • From:
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: ROSCOE tutorial needed
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Make of it what you will ... (Part 4)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: ROSCOE tutorial needed
  • From:
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From:
• Re: ROSCOE tutorial needed
  • From: charles hottel
• Re: Make of it what you will ... (Part 4)
  • From: James J. Gavan
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• ROSCOE tutorial needed
  • From: sunny
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: Make of it what you will ... (Part 4)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: James J. Gavan
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: Arnold Trembley
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Make of it what you will ... (Part 4)
  • From: James J. Gavan
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Make of it what you will ... (Part 3)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Make of it what you will ... (Part 1)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Make of it what you will ... (Part 2)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Mainframe Developer-Contract 12 months (Columbia, SC)
  • From: Kevin M
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Make of it what you will ... (Part 3)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: [OT] WBC Nutjob
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Make of it what you will ... (Part 2)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Make of it what you will ... (Part 1)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: Peter Lacey
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: Richard
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: discussions on the forum c.l.cobol
  • From: Robert Jones
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From:
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: Question about behaviour of nested COPY REPLACING statements.
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT - discussions on the forum c.l.cobol
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: discussions on the forum c.l.cobol
  • From: Roger J
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Holly
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: arrbee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: Rick Smith
• Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
  • From: arrbee
• Re: OT - discussions on the forum c.l.cobol
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Mainframe Developer-Contract 12 months (Columbia, SC)
  • From: iTRS.Net, Inc.
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Mainframe Developer-Contract 12 months (Columbia, SC)
  • From:
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: OT - discussions on the forum c.l.cobol
  • From: LX-i
• [OT] WBC Nutjob
  • From: LX-i
• OT - discussions on the forum c.l.cobol
  • From: William M. Klein
• [OT] Keepin' It Real (Was: Any comments? (Answers to Pete))
  • From: LX-i
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Mainframe Developer-Contract 12 months (Columbia, SC)
  • From: iTRS.Net, Inc.
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Richard
• Re: discussions on the forum c.l.cobol
  • From: Richard
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Holly
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Holly
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• discussions on the forum c.l.cobol
  • From: Alain Reymond
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: discussions on the forum c.l.cobol
  • From: Vince Coen
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Holly
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Michael Mattias
• New DFSORT/ICETOOL Features (April, 2006)
  • From: yaeger
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• OT Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Clark Morris
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: [OT] C# Learning Resources
  • From: LX-i
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: [OT] C# Learning Resources
  • From: Joe Zitzelberger
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Joseph Katnic
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: [OT] C# Learning Resources
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Objects without class
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Question about behaviour of nested COPY REPLACING statements.
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Holly
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Death of corporations was Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Holly
• Re: Death of corporations was Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: Death of corporations was Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Peter Lacey
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Question about behaviour of nested COPY REPLACING statements.
  • From: Sergey Kashyrin
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Clark Morris
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: [OT] C# Learning Resources
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: Death of corporations was Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Question about behaviour of nested COPY REPLACING statements.
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] C# Learning Resources
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Death of corporations was Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Clark Morris
• Re: [OT] C# Learning Resources
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Joel C. Ewing
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: [OT] C# Learning Resources
  • From: LX-i
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: [OT] C# Learning Resources
  • From: LX-i
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Holly
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Holly
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Holly
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Richard
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Richard
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Richard
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Richard
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Holly
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Holly
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Holly
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] C# Learning Resources
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: [OT] C# Learning Resources
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: pstat_getproc()
  • From: Chris
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] C# Learning Resources
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Joel C. Ewing
• [OT] C# Learning Resources
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: How many bytes?
  • From: slade2
• Re: How many bytes?
  • From: Gerry Palmer
• How many bytes?
  • From: gcotterl
• How bany bytes?
  • From: gcotterl
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Mainframe simulator
  • From: R.Freitag
• Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Mainframe simulator
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: Mainframe simulator
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Clark Morris
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Mainframe simulator
  • From: Colin Campbell
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Holly
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: The "A" word (was RE: Any comments (The "A" Word ...)...)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: pstat_getproc()
  • From: Chris
• Re: Mainframe simulator
  • From:
• Re: Mainframe simulator
  • From: Sergey Kashyrin
• Re: Mainframe simulator
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: The "A" word (was RE: Any comments (The "A" Word ...)...)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: Mainframe simulator
  • From:
• Mainframe simulator
  • From: Xavier . Deepak
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Richard
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Holly
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: The "A" word (was RE: Any comments (The "A" Word ...)...)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: The "A" word (was RE: Any comments (The "A" Word ...)...)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Holly
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: The "A" word (was RE: Any comments (The "A" Word ...)...)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Holly
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Richard
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Richard
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Richard
• Re: jcl sort question
  • From: yaeger
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: jcl sort question
  • From: frenchy
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: jcl sort question
  • From: yaeger
• Re: The "A" word (was RE: Any comments (The "A" Word ...)...)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: The "A" word (was RE: Any comments (The "A" Word ...)...)
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: pstat_getproc()
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: jcl sort question
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• jcl sort question
  • From: frenchy
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: DSNHSM2P LINE 33106 COL 62 AN OPERAND OF "LIKE" IS NOT VALID
  • From: backustwo
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: The "A" word (was RE: Any comments (The "A" Word ...)...)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: God's View of Tennessee (was Re: Any Comments? (Answers to Pete))
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: God's View of Tennessee (was Re: Any Comments? (Answers to Pete))
  • From:
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: The "A" word (was RE: Any comments (The "A" Word ...)...)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: The "A" word (was RE: Any comments (The "A" Word ...)...)
  • From:
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: The "A" word (was RE: Any comments (The "A" Word ...)...)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: The "A" word (was RE: Any comments (The "A" Word ...)...)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: The "A" word (was RE: Any comments (The "A" Word ...)...)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: The "A" word (was RE: Any comments (The "A" Word ...)...)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: The "A" word (was RE: Any comments (The "A" Word ...)...)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Very important conference
  • From: Alistair
• Re: DSNHSM2P LINE 33106 COL 62 AN OPERAND OF "LIKE" IS NOT VALID
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: God's View of Tennessee (was Re: Any Comments? (Answers to Pete))
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: God's View of Tennessee (was Re: Any Comments? (Answers to Pete))
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Is Cobol obsolete?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: The "A" word (was RE: Any comments (The "A" Word ...)...)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: The "A" word (was RE: Any comments (The "A" Word ...)...)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: The "A" word (was RE: Any comments (The "A" Word ...)...)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: DSNHSM2P LINE 33106 COL 62 AN OPERAND OF "LIKE" IS NOT VALID
  • From: Robert Jones
• Re: Triggering JCL job from other job
  • From: Arnold Trembley
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Holly
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: The "A" word (was RE: Any comments (The "A" Word ...)...)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: The "A" word (was RE: Any comments (The "A" Word ...)...)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Triggering JCL job from other job
  • From: Gerry Palmer
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Triggering JCL job from other job
  • From: Gerry Palmer
• Re: The "A" word (was RE: Any comments (The "A" Word ...)...)
  • From: Clark Morris
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: DSNHSM2P LINE 33106 COL 62 AN OPERAND OF "LIKE" IS NOT VALID
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Is Cobol obsolete?
  • From: LX-i
• Re: God's View of Tennessee (was Re: Any Comments? (Answers to Pete))
  • From: LX-i
• Re: The "A" word (was RE: Any comments (The "A" Word ...)...)
  • From: Richard
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Richard
• Re: The "A" word (was RE: Any comments (The "A" Word ...)...)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: The "A" word (was RE: Any comments (The "A" Word ...)...)
  • From: Richard
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• IBM, SEARCH ALL- Problem "fix" (was: Heads Up - LE PE - PK15432
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: The "A" word (was RE: Any comments (The "A" Word ...)...)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: The "A" word (was RE: Any comments (The "A" Word ...)...)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: DSNHSM2P LINE 33106 COL 62 AN OPERAND OF "LIKE" IS NOT VALID
  • From: Richard
• Re: The "A" word (was RE: Any comments (The "A" Word ...)...)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: The "A" word (was RE: Any comments (The "A" Word ...)...)
  • From: Richard
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Richard
• Re: sort outrec - need to set a flag
  • From: yaeger
• Re: sort outrec - need to set a flag
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: sort outrec - need to set a flag
  • From:
• sort outrec - need to set a flag
  • From: frenchy
• Re: pstat_getproc()
  • From: Chris
• Re: pstat_getproc()
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Is Cobol obsolete?
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: The "A" word (was RE: Any comments (The "A" Word ...)...)
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: The "A" word (was RE: Any comments (The "A" Word ...)...)
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: God's View of Tennessee (was Re: Any Comments? (Answers to Pete))
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: The "A" word (was RE: Any comments (The "A" Word ...)...)
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: DSNHSM2P LINE 33106 COL 62 AN OPERAND OF "LIKE" IS NOT VALID
  • From: backustwo
• Re: Book of Judas (was Re: Any comments ...)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Is Cobol obsolete?
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: Book of Judas (was Re: Any comments ...)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Book of Judas (was Re: Any comments ...)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: God's View of Tennessee (was Re: Any Comments? (Answers to Pete))
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Is Cobol obsolete?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: The "A" word (was RE: Any comments (The "A" Word ...)...)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: Triggering JCL job from other job
  • From:
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: God's View of Tennessee (was Re: Any Comments? (Answers to Pete))
  • From: Holly
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Holly
• Re: Triggering JCL job from other job
  • From: William M. Klein
• Triggering JCL job from other job
  • From: Malli
• Re: The "A" word (was RE: Any comments (The "A" Word ...)...)
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: DSNHSM2P LINE 33106 COL 62 AN OPERAND OF "LIKE" IS NOT VALID
  • From: LX-i
• Re: The "A" word (was RE: Any comments (The "A" Word ...)...)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: The "A" word (was RE: Any comments (The "A" Word ...)...)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Richard
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: pstat_getproc()
  • From: James J. Gavan
• Re: pstat_getproc()
  • From: Chris
• Re: Future of programming was Re: END-IF
  • From: void * clvrmnky()
• pstat_getproc()
  • From: Chris
• Re: Book of Judas (was Re: Any comments ...)
  • From: Vince Coen
• Re: Is Cobol obsolete?
  • From: James J. Gavan
• Re: DSNHSM2P LINE 33106 COL 62 AN OPERAND OF "LIKE" IS NOT VALID
  • From: Robert Jones
• Re: The "A" word (was RE: Any comments (The "A" Word ...)...)
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: The "A" word (was RE: Any comments (The "A" Word ...)...)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: DSNHSM2P LINE 33106 COL 62 AN OPERAND OF "LIKE" IS NOT VALID
  • From: Holly
• Re: The "A" word (was RE: Any comments (The "A" Word ...)...)
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: The "A" word (was RE: Any comments (The "A" Word ...)...)
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: The "A" word (was RE: Any comments (The "A" Word ...)...)
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: The "A" word (was RE: Any comments (The "A" Word ...)...)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: The "A" word (was RE: Any comments (The "A" Word ...)...)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: The "A" word (was RE: Any comments (The "A" Word ...)...)
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Book of Judas (was Re: Any comments ...)
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Very important conference
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• God's View of Tennessee (was Re: Any Comments? (Answers to Pete))
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Book of Judas (was Re: Any comments ...)
  • From: Jeff Campbell
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: The "A" word (was RE: Any comments (The "A" Word ...)...)
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Book of Judas (was Re: Any comments ...)
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments?
  • From: Holly
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: The "A" word (was RE: Any comments (The "A" Word ...)...)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: The "A" word (was RE: Any comments (The "A" Word ...)...)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Book of Judas (was Re: Any comments ...)
  • From:
• Re: Any comments (answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Book of Judas (was Re: Any comments ...)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Is Cobol obsolete?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Very important conference
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Very important conference
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: Any comments?
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Any comments?
  • From: Holly
• Re: Any comments (answers to Pete)
  • From: Holly
• Re: Very important conference
  • From: Holly
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Richard
• Re: The "A" word (was RE: Any comments (The "A" Word ...)...)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: The "A" word (was RE: Any comments (The "A" Word ...)...)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Richard
• Re: The "A" word (was RE: Any comments (The "A" Word ...)...)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Very important conference
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: The "A" word (was RE: Any comments (The "A" Word ...)...)
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Book of Judas (was Re: Any comments ...)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: Book of Judas (was Re: Any comments ...)
  • From: Vince Coen
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Richard
• Re: Very important conference
  • From: Richard
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Richard
• Re: Is Cobol obsolete?
  • From: Richard
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Richard
• Re: Very important conference
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: Is Cobol obsolete?
  • From: Donald Tees
• The "A" word (was RE: Any comments (The "A" Word ...)...)
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Holly
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Holly
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Holly
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Is Cobol obsolete?
  • From:
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: Is Cobol obsolete?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: Is Cobol obsolete?
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Book of Judas (was Re: Any comments ...)
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Very important conference
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: OT creation vs evolution as theories was Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Is Cobol obsolete?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Future of programming was Re: END-IF
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Clark Morris
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Very important conference
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: Very important conference
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: SQL Commands
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Very important conference
  • From: Donald Tees
• Very important conference
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: New project without training or tools was Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: IF statement, I don't understand this
  • From: Last Boy Scout
• Re: For Holly
  • From: Holly
• Re: Any comments?
  • From: Holly
• Re: OT creation vs evolution as theories was Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Richard
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• OT creation vs evolution as theories was Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Clark Morris
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Clark Morris
• OT Creation vs Evolution wasRe: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Clark Morris
• New project without training or tools was Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Clark Morris
• Future of programming was Re: END-IF
  • From: Clark Morris
• Re: Any comments? (The "A" word - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Richard
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Richard
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Richard
• Re: Getting started
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: Getting started
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Any comments? (The "A" word - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: Any comments (answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• For Holly
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Any comments? (The "A" word - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: SQL Commands
  • From: Frederico Fonseca
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Any comments (answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Holly
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: Any comments? (The "A" word - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (The "A" word - was Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: SQL Commands
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (The "A" word - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Getting started
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Any comments? (The "A" word - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Holly
• Re: Any comments? (The "A" word - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Any comments? (The "A" word - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: Any comments? (The "A" word - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Any comments? (The "A" word - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Holly
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Holly
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Holly
• Re: Any comments? (The "A" word - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: Holly
• Re: Any comments? (The "A" word - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: Is Cobol obsolete?
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: Migration (was: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Holly
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Holly
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Holly
• Re: Migration (was: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Holly
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Holly
• Re: Is Cobol obsolete?
  • From: Peter Lacey
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Holly
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Is COBOL obsolete
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Holly
• Re: Is COBOL obsolete
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: SQL Commands
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: SQL Commands
  • From: Frederico Fonseca
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: SQL Commands
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Is COBOL obsolete
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From:
• Migration (was: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Holly
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Holly
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Getting started
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: SQL Commands
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Migration question (was: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From:
• Re: Is Cobol obsolete?
  • From: LX-i
• Re: SQL Commands
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: Getting started
  • From:
• Re: SQL Commands
  • From: Frederico Fonseca
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: roger_pearse
• Re: CICS DOCUMENT CREATE storage?
  • From: Steamroller
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Getting started
  • From: anderschwan
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: anderschwan
• Re: Getting started
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: anderschwan
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From:
• Re: SQL Commands
  • From: void * clvrmnky()
• Re: Getting started
  • From:
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: anderschwan
• Re: Getting started
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: Getting started
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Getting started
  • From: anderschwan
• Re: Getting started
  • From:
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Getting started
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Getting started
  • From:
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Getting started
  • From: anderschwan
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From:
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Is Cobol obsolete?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Getting started
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: Is Cobol obsolete?
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: roger_pearse
• Re: conflicting variables names on differents records.
  • From: gianluigi beuzard
• Re: conflicting variables names on differents records.
  • From: gianluigi beuzard
• Re: conflicting variables names on differents records.
  • From: gianluigi beuzard
• Re: conflicting variables names on differents records.
  • From: gianluigi beuzard
• SQL Commands
  • From: Servizio Tecnico
• Re: Getting started
  • From: hcmason
• Re: CICS DOCUMENT CREATE storage?
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: anderschwan
• Re: conflicting variables names on differents records.
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: conflicting variables names on differents records.
  • From: William M. Klein
• Is Cobol obsolete?
  • From: Peter Lacey
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: conflicting variables names on differents records.
  • From: gianluigi beuzard
• Re
  • From: gianluigi beuzard
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From:
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: conflicting variables names on differents records.
  • From: Robert Jones
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: roger_pearse
• conflicting variables names on differents records.
  • From: gianluigi beuzard
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From:
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: IF statement, I don't understand this
  • From: Roger J
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From:
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: roger_pearse
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From:
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: roger_pearse
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: roger_pearse
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: roger_pearse
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Alistair
• Getting started
  • From: Capheind
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Richard
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Richard
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Richard
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Richard
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From:
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: roger_pearse
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: roger_pearse
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: roger_pearse
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Constants, Static, Public, Private
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: roger_pearse
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From:
• Re: Any comments?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: roger_pearse
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From:
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: roger_pearse
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Richard
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Richard
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: IF statement, I don't understand this
  • From: RR
• Re: IBM Cobol and Unisys Cobol
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: IBM Cobol and Unisys Cobol
  • From: Pallu
• Re: IBM Cobol and Unisys Cobol
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: IBM Cobol and Unisys Cobol
  • From: LX-i
• IBM Cobol and Unisys Cobol
  • From: inqusite
• Re: Constants, Static, Public, Private
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Constants, Static, Public, Private
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: IF statement, I don't understand this
  • From: Michael Wojcik
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Chuck Stevens
• Re: IF statement, I don't understand this
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Any comments?
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Any comments? (Deconstructing WBC)
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Any comments?
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: IF statement, I don't understand this
  • From: JJ
• Re: Any comments?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Not my homework
  • From: Alistair
• Re: IF statement, I don't understand this
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Any comments?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: IF statement, I don't understand this
  • From:
• Re: OpenCOBOL, MINGW/Cygwin and gmp.h problem
  • From: val.hoffman
• Re: CICS DOCUMENT CREATE storage?
  • From: Arnold Trembley
• Re: IF statement, I don't understand this
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: IF statement, I don't understand this
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: IF statement, I don't understand this
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: Constants, Static, Public, Private
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: IF statement, I don't understand this
  • From: Richard
• Re: OpenCOBOL, MINGW/Cygwin and gmp.h problem
  • From: Richard
• Re: OpenCOBOL, MINGW/Cygwin and gmp.h problem
  • From: val.hoffman
• Re: Constants, Static, Public, Private
  • From: Michael Wojcik

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(18)