Re: "Philosphical" question on "succesful" file status testing
- From: docdwarf@xxxxxxxxx ()
- Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 01:45:45 +0000 (UTC)
In article <M_M4g.173857$zy2.141605@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
William M. Klein <wmklein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
As a follow-up to another thread and NOT expecting consensus of opinion, I
thought I would ask this question:
When is it a "good" thing to test only the first character for "0" versus
testing for specific file status codes?
Why... when the person who signs your timesheets tells you it is, of
course!
DD
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: "Philosphical" question on "succesful" file status testing
- From: Last Boy Scout
- Re: "Philosphical" question on "succesful" file status testing
- References:
- "Philosphical" question on "succesful" file status testing
- From: William M. Klein
- "Philosphical" question on "succesful" file status testing
- Prev by Date: Re: How to accept multiple lines of Instream data.
- Next by Date: Re: IBM file status 97 (was: Prodcuing an output file onlyonFriday?
- Previous by thread: "Philosphical" question on "succesful" file status testing
- Next by thread: Re: "Philosphical" question on "succesful" file status testing
- Index(es):