comp.lang.cobol

Thread Index

Re: EOF location?
- From: Richard
Re: Is a career switch to the mainframe/cobol world responsible?
- From: hcmason
Re: Minor? editorial correction for ACCEPT and DISPLAY statements
- From: Chuck Stevens
Re: PIC P put to real use
- From: Richard
Re: Dynamic Allocation-Related Question
- From: William M. Klein
Re: PIC P put to real use
- From: Michael Mattias
Re: Newbie Question
- From: Michael Mattias
Re: PIC P put to real use
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: Newbie Question
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: Dynamic Allocation-Related Question
- From: Pépé le Pew
Re: Newbie Question
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: Newbie Question
- From: Oliver Wong
Re: PIC P put to real use
- From: Chuck Stevens
Re: Newbie Question
- From: Michael Mattias
Re: Newbie Question
- From: Binyamin Dissen
Re: Newbie Question
- From: theHip
Re: PIC P put to real use
- From: Oliver Wong
Re: Rewrite Twice?
- From: dmckeon
Re: Newbie Question
- From: Oliver Wong
Re: EOF location?
- From: Clever Monkey
Re: PIC P put to real use
- From: Michael Mattias
Re: Newbie Question
- From:
Re: Newbie Question
- From: Michael Mattias
Re: PIC P put to real use
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: Rewrite Twice?
- From: Rick Smith
Re: EOF location?
- From: Clever Monkey
Re: Newbie Question
- From: Binyamin Dissen
Re: PIC P put to real use
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: Newbie Question
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: Newbie Question
- From: Donald Tees
Re: Newbie Question
- From: Binyamin Dissen
Re: Rewrite Twice?
- From: Binyamin Dissen
Re: Newbie Question
- From: theHip
Re: Newbie Question
- From: Howard Brazee
Newbie Question
- From: the_tragic_hip
Rewrite Twice?
- From: dmckeon
Re: Accept / Display - an "environment variables
- From: Chuck Stevens
Re: Accept / Display - an "environment variables
- From: Chuck Stevens
Dynamic Allocation-Related Question
- From: OppThumb
Re: PIC P put to real use
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: PIC P put to real use
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: PIC P put to real use
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: PIC P put to real use
- From: Alistair
Re: Is a career switch to the mainframe/cobol world responsible?
- From: Alistair
Re: PIC P put to real use
- From: Richard
Re: PIC P put to real use
- From: Roger While
Re: PIC P put to real use
- From: Richard
Re: PIC P put to real use
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: Microfocus 4.0.38 problem running in XP
- From: Donald Tees
Microfocus 4.0.38 problem running in XP
- From: Gord
Re: PIC P put to real use
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: PIC P put to real use
- From: Richard
Re: EOF location?
- From: Richard
Re: EOF location?
- From: Richard
Re: How do you search the word in a sequential file ?
- From: Rick Smith
Re: How do you search the word in a sequential file ?
- From: Peter Lacey
Re: EOF location?
- From: Clever Monkey
Re: EOF location?
- From: Clever Monkey
Re: PIC P put to real use
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: EOF location?
- From: Clever Monkey
Re: PIC P put to real use
- From:
Re: How do you search the word in a sequential file ?
- From: William M. Klein
Re: How do you search the word in a sequential file ?
- From:
Re: Variable length Records procesing on IBM Mainframes
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: PIC P put to real use
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: PIC P put to real use
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: How do you search the word in a sequential file ?
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: How do you search the word in a sequential file ?
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: How do you search the word in a sequential file ?
- From: Jeff
Re: EOF location?
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: How do you search the word in a sequential file ?
- From: Binyamin Dissen
Re: EOF location?
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: How do you search the word in a sequential file ?
- From: Binyamin Dissen
Re: How do you search the word in a sequential file ?
- From: Jeff
Re: EOF location?
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: EOF location?
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Tools for make menus on FJ Powercobol.
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: PIC P put to real use
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: How do you search the word in a sequential file ?
- From: Richard
Re: How do you search the word in a sequential file ?
- From:
How do you search the word in a sequential file ?
- From: badilus
Re: Tools for make menus on FJ Powercobol.
- From:
Re: EOF location?
- From: Richard
Tools for make menus on FJ Powercobol.
- From: Massimo
Re: Long numbers programming
- From: Waldek Hebisch
Re: Is a career switch to the mainframe/cobol world responsible?
- From: CG
Re: EOF location?
- From: Richard
Re: EOF location?
- From: Roger While
Re: EOF location?
- From: Clever Monkey
Re: [OT] Back Again
- From:
Re: EOF location?
- From: Robert Jones
Re: Is a career switch to the mainframe/cobol world responsible?
- From: PeterC
Re: [OT] Back Again
- From: Pat Hall
Re: [OT] Back Again
- From: SkippyPB
Re: EOF location?
- From: Oliver Wong
Re: Is a career switch to the mainframe/cobol world responsible?
- From: CG
Re: Is a career switch to the mainframe/cobol world responsible?
- From: CG
Re: EOF location?
- From: HeyBub
Re: PIC P put to real use
- From: Alistair
Re: Is a career switch to the mainframe/cobol world responsible?
- From: Alistair
Re: EOF location?
- From:
Re: EOF location?
- From: Michael Mattias
Re: PIC P put to real use
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: EOF location?
- From: Pete Dashwood
[OT] Back Again
- From:
Re: PIC P put to real use
- From:
Re: Combined Abbreviated contidionts (was: PIC P put to real use
- From:
Re: EOF location?
- From: Richard
Re: Is a career switch to the mainframe/cobol world responsible?
- From: CG
Re: PIC P put to real use
- From: HeyBub
Re: EOF location?
- From: HeyBub
Re: EOF location?
- From: Richard
Re: Variable length Records procesing on IBM Mainframes
- From: hcmason
Re: Variable length Records procesing on IBM Mainframes
- From: Pépé le Pew
Re: Is a career switch to the mainframe/cobol world responsible?
- From: Alistair
Re: EOF location?
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: EOF location?
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: EOF location?
- From: Rick Smith
Re: EOF location?
- From: Michael Mattias
Is a career switch to the mainframe/cobol world responsible?
- From: PeterC
Re: EOF location?
- From: Roger While
Re: PIC P put to real use
- From: Donald Tees
Re: EOF location?
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: EOF location?
- From: Rick Smith
Re: EOF location?
- From: Arnold Trembley
Re: EOF location?
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: EOF location?
- From: Rick Smith
Re: EOF location?
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: PIC P put to real use
- From: berlutte
Re: PIC P put to real use
- From: berlutte
Re: Minor? editorial correction for ACCEPT and DISPLAY statements
- From: Rick Smith
Re: EOF location?
- From: Richard
EOF location?
- From: HeyBub
Re: Variable length Records procesing on IBM Mainframes
- From: William M. Klein
Re: Combined Abbreviated contidionts (was: PIC P put to real use
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: PIC P put to real use
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: PIC P put to real use
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Combined Abbreviated contidionts (was: PIC P put to real use
- From: Roger While
Re: Minor? editorial correction for ACCEPT and DISPLAY statements
- From: Roger While
Re: Variable length Records procesing on IBM Mainframes
- From: Colin Campbell
Re: Accept / Display - an "environment variables
- From: William M. Klein
Re: PIC P put to real use
- From:
Re: PIC P put to real use
- From: Donald Tees
Re: PIC P put to real use
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Accept / Display - an "environment variables
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Combined Abbreviated contidionts (was: PIC P put to real use
- From: William M. Klein
Re: PIC P put to real use
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: Minor? editorial correction for ACCEPT and DISPLAY statements
- From: Rick Smith
Re: Minor? editorial correction for ACCEPT and DISPLAY statements
- From: Rick Smith
Re: Variable length Records procesing on IBM Mainframes
- From: William M. Klein
Re: Variable length Records procesing on IBM Mainframes
- From: Michael Mattias
Variable length Records procesing on IBM Mainframes
- From: hcmason
Re: Accept / Display - an "environment variables
- From: Chuck Stevens
Re: Minor? editorial correction for ACCEPT and DISPLAY statements
- From: Chuck Stevens
Re: Accept / Display - an "environment variables
- From: Peter Lacey
Minor? editorial correction for ACCEPT and DISPLAY statements
- From: Rick Smith
Re: Accept / Display - an "environment variables
- From: William M. Klein
Re: Accept / Display - an "environment variables
- From: Chuck Stevens
Re: Accept / Display - an "environment variables
- From: Chuck Stevens
Re: get/set runtime environment information
- From: Chuck Stevens
Accept / Display - an "environment variables
- From: William M. Klein
Re: PIC P put to real use
- From: Chuck Stevens
Re: If all the CoBOL people updating the language...
- From: Clever Monkey
Re: PIC P put to real use
- From: Chuck Stevens
Re: Long numbers programming
- From: Roger While
Re: Long numbers programming
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: PIC P put to real use
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: PIC P put to real use
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: COBOL calling EZT
- From: CG
Re: Long numbers programming
- From: Waldek Hebisch
Re: Ridin' tall on the Santiago Canyon Road (was Re: What could J4 (or WG4) do)
- From: Richard
Re: Ridin' tall on the Santiago Canyon Road (was Re: What could J4 (or WG4) do)
- From: Chuck Stevens
Re: Ridin' tall on the Santiago Canyon Road (was Re: What could J4 (or WG4) do)
- From: Colin Campbell
Re: If all the CoBOL people updating the language...
- From: Alistair
Re: Efficient timers in Net Express or Object COBOL
- From: Michael Mattias
Re: Efficient timers in Net Express or Object COBOL
- From: eselick
Re: MFUSER program won't run in Micro Focus
- From: eselick
Re: Ridin' tall on the Santiago Canyon Road (was Re: What could J4 (or WG4) do)
- From: Chuck Stevens
Re: If all the CoBOL people updating the language...
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: rm - cobol 85 screen designing
- From: ganesh
Re: Cobol Runtime error handling library
- From: Sergey Kashyrin
Re: If all the CoBOL people updating the language...
- From: Richard
Re: PIC P put to real use
- From: HeyBub
Re: FUNCTION vs PROGRAM
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: PIC P put to real use
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: PIC P put to real use
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: If all the CoBOL people updating the language...
- From: Clever Monkey
Re: PIC P put to real use
- From: Chuck Stevens
Re: PIC P put to real use
- From: Richard
Re: What could J4 (or WG4) do
- From: Chuck Stevens
Re: What could J4 (or WG4) do
- From: William M. Klein
Re: FUNCTION vs PROGRAM
- From: William M. Klein
Re: MFUSER program won't run in Micro Focus
- From: Stephen Gennard
Re: COBOL calling EZT
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: COBOL calling EZT
- From: William M. Klein
Re: OT: Ridin' tall on the Santiago Canyon Road (was Re: What could J4 (or WG4) do)
- From: Alistair
Re: PIC P put to real use
- From: Chuck Stevens
Re: PIC P put to real use
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: OT: Ridin' tall on the Santiago Canyon Road (was Re: What could J4 (or WG4) do)
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: If all the CoBOL people updating the language...
- From: Richard
PIC P put to real use
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: Is the (draft) 2008 standard available ?
- From: Rick Smith
Re: OT: Ridin' tall on the Santiago Canyon Road (was Re: What could J4 (or WG4) do)
- From: Chuck Stevens
Re: OT: Ridin' tall on the Santiago Canyon Road (was Re: What could J4 (or WG4) do)
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: OT: Ridin' tall on the Santiago Canyon Road (was Re: What could J4 (or WG4) do)
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: If all the CoBOL people updating the language...
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: COBOL calling EZT
- From: Frederico Fonseca
Re: rm - cobol 85 screen designing
- From: Frederico Fonseca
Re: If all the CoBOL people updating the language...
- From: Clever Monkey
Re: Efficient timers in Net Express or Object COBOL
- From: Simon Tobias
Re: What could J4 (or WG4) do
- From: Chuck Stevens
OT: Ridin' tall on the Santiago Canyon Road (was Re: What could J4 (or WG4) do)
- From: Chuck Stevens
Re: FUNCTION vs PROGRAM
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: Efficient timers in Net Express or Object COBOL
- From: Michael Mattias
Re: Efficient timers in Net Express or Object COBOL
- From: eselick
Re: MFUSER program won't run in Micro Focus
- From: Gael Wilson
Re: Efficient timers in Net Express or Object COBOL
- From: Michael Mattias
Re: What could J4 (or WG4) do
- From: Chuck Stevens
Efficient timers in Net Express or Object COBOL
- From: eselick
Re: If all the CoBOL people updating the language...
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: What could J4 (or WG4) do
- From: Chuck Stevens
Re: Cobol Runtime error handling library
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: rm - cobol 85 screen designing
- From: Bob Iles
MFUSER program won't run in Micro Focus
- From: eselick
Re: 2008 FUNCTION TRIM
- From: Roger While
Re: rm - cobol 85 screen designing
- From: ganesh
get/set runtime environment information
- From: Roger While
Re: 2008 FUNCTION TRIM
- From: William M. Klein
COBOL calling EZT
- From: himu_abhi
Re: rm - cobol 85 screen designing
- From: Frederico Fonseca
rm - cobol 85 screen designing
- From: ganesh
Re: 2008 FUNCTION TRIM
- From: Roger While
Re: fujitsu netcobol v7 enterprise edition
- From: Richard
fujitsu netcobol v7 enterprise edition
- From: rajeev . rsd
fujitsu netcobol v7 enterprise edition
- From: rajeev . rsd
fujitsu netcobol v7 enterprise edition
- From: rajeev . rsd
Re: Cobol Runtime error handling library
- From: Richard
Re: Cobol Runtime error handling library
- From: Bala
Re: If all the CoBOL people updating the language...
- From: Holly
Re: What could J4 (or WG4) do
- From: William M. Klein
Problem with Packed fileds
- From: Jyothy
Re: What could J4 (or WG4) do
- From: James J. Gavan
Re: What could J4 (or WG4) do
- From: Chuck Stevens
"Side effects" (Functions, Programs, Object/Methods
- From: William M. Klein
Re: Is the (draft) 2008 standard available ?
- From: William M. Klein
Re: 2008 FUNCTION TRIM
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: FUNCTION vs PROGRAM
- From: William M. Klein
Re: 2008 FUNCTION TRIM
- From: William M. Klein
Re: If all the CoBOL people updating the language...
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: What could J4 (or WG4) do
- From: Chuck Stevens
Re: What could J4 (or WG4) do
- From: James J. Gavan
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: James J. Gavan
Re: If all the CoBOL people updating the language...
- From: Clever Monkey
Re: What could J4 (or WG4) do
- From: James J. Gavan
Re: 2008 FUNCTION TRIM
- From: Chuck Stevens
Re: 2008 FUNCTION TRIM
- From: Roger While
Re: Is the (draft) 2008 standard available ?
- From: Chuck Stevens
If all the CoBOL people updating the language...
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: runtime message
- From: Bob Iles
Re: runtime message
- From: Donald Tees
Re: 2008 FUNCTION TRIM
- From: Peter Lacey
Re: 2008 FUNCTION TRIM
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: FUNCTION vs PROGRAM
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: FUNCTION vs PROGRAM
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: abortive exiting
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: runtime message
- From: Bob Iles
Re: runtime message
- From: Jerome
Re: runtime message
- From: Bob Iles
Re: FUNCTION vs PROGRAM
- From: Donald Tees
Re: Cobol Runtime error handling library
- From: Sergey Kashyrin
Re: runtime message
- From: Richard
Re: runtime message
- From: Jerome
2008 FUNCTION TRIM
- From: Roger While
Re: runtime message
- From: Richard
Re: What could J4 (or WG4) do (was: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: runtime message
- From: Keith Lowe
Re: What could J4 (or WG4) do (was: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Is the (draft) 2008 standard available ?
- From: Roger While
runtime message
- From: Jerome
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Cobol Runtime error handling library
- From: Richard
Re: FUNCTION vs PROGRAM
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: FUNCTION vs PROGRAM
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: FUNCTION vs PROGRAM
- From: Richard
Re: FUNCTION vs PROGRAM
- From: Donald Tees
Re: Is the (draft) 2008 standard available ?
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: FUNCTION vs PROGRAM
- From: Frank Swarbrick
what if COBOL had closures
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: What could J4 (or WG4) do (was: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Chuck Stevens
Re: abortive exiting
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: What could J4 (or WG4) do (was: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Richard
Re: J4 (INCITS aka ANSI COBOL) Committee update
- From: Chuck Stevens
Re: abortive exiting
- From: Rick Smith
Re: What could J4 (or WG4) do (was: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Chuck Stevens
Re: What could J4 (or WG4) do (was: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Chuck Stevens
Re: What could J4 (or WG4) do (was: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Chuck Stevens
Re: Is the (draft) 2008 standard available ?
- From: Robert Jones
Re: What could J4 (or WG4) do (was: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Richard
Is the (draft) 2008 standard available ?
- From: Roger While
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Richard
Re: What could J4 (or WG4) do (was: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Chuck Stevens
Re: FUNCTION vs PROGRAM
- From: William M. Klein
Re: more fun with decimal arithmetic
- From: epc8
Re: more fun with decimal arithmetic
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: more fun with decimal arithmetic
- From: epc8
Re: more fun with decimal arithmetic
- From: epc8
FUNCTION vs PROGRAM
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: more fun with decimal arithmetic
- From: Peter Lacey
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Ian Dalziel
Re: What could J4 (or WG4) do (was: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: What could J4 (or WG4) do (was: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: more fun with decimal arithmetic
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: What could J4 (or WG4) do (was: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: What could J4 (or WG4) do (was: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: What could J4 (or WG4) do (was: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Richard
Re: What could J4 (or WG4) do (was: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: William M. Klein
Re: abortive exiting
- From: Richard
Re: What could J4 (or WG4) do (was: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Robert Jones
Re: Computer Science v. Computer Information Systems
- From: notablyinclined
Re: What could J4 (or WG4) do (was: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From:
Re: abortive exiting
- From: Rick Smith
Re: What could J4 (or WG4) do (was: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: William M. Klein
Re: Long numbers programming
- From: Peter Lacey
Re: What could J4 (or WG4) do (was: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: more fun with decimal arithmetic
- From: Alistair
Re: What could J4 (or WG4) do (was: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: What could J4 (or WG4) do (was: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: COBOL FAQ
- From: Roger While
Re: J4 (INCITS aka ANSI COBOL) Committee update
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: What could J4 (or WG4) do (was: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From:
Re: J4 (INCITS aka ANSI COBOL) Committee update
- From:
Re: J4 (INCITS aka ANSI COBOL) Committee update
- From:
Re: What could J4 (or WG4) do (was: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: William M. Klein
Re: What could J4 (or WG4) do (was: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Chuck Stevens
Re: What could J4 (or WG4) do (was: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Chuck Stevens
Re: abortive exiting
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: How-to divide float ?
- From: Pépé le Pew
Re: Any comments?
- From: Chuck Stevens
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Chuck Stevens
Re: J4 (INCITS aka ANSI COBOL) Committee update
- From: Roger While
Re: J4 (INCITS aka ANSI COBOL) Committee update
- From: Chuck Stevens
Re: How-to divide float ?
- From: Jerome
Re: How-to divide float ?
- From:
Re: abortive exiting
- From: Roger While
Re: abortive exiting
- From: Roger While
more fun with decimal arithmetic
- From: epc8
Re: Long numbers programming
- From: epc8
Re: abortive exiting
- From: William M. Klein
Re: abortive exiting
- From: Richard
Re: abortive exiting
- From: Rick Smith
Re: abortive exiting
- From: Richard
Re: How-to divide float ?
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: How-to divide float ?
- From: Pépé le Pew
Cobol call BPXWDYN
- From: Ralph Bremer
Re: abortive exiting
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: abortive exiting
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: abortive exiting
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: abortive exiting
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: abortive exiting
- From: Rick Smith
Re: Long numbers programming
- From: James J. Gavan
Re: abortive exiting
- From: Roger While
Re: abortive exiting
- From: Roger While
Re: abortive exiting
- From: Roger While
Re: How-to divide float ?
- From: Jerome
Re: Long numbers programming
- From: epc8
Re: Long numbers programming
- From: Peter Lacey
Re: abortive exiting
- From: Richard
Re: How-to divide float ?
- From: Richard
Re: How-to divide float ?
- From: William M. Klein
Re: abortive exiting
- From: William M. Klein
Re: Long numbers programming
- From: epc8
Re: abortive exiting
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: Long numbers programming
- From: epc8
Re: abortive exiting
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: abortive exiting
- From: Roger While
Re: Long numbers programming
- From: Peter Lacey
Re: How-to divide float ?
- From: Donald Tees
Re: How-to divide float ?
- From: Richard
Re: abortive exiting
- From: Richard
Re: abortive exiting
- From: William M. Klein
Re: Computer Science v. Computer Information Systems
- From: Louis Krupp
Re: abortive exiting
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: How-to divide float ?
- From: Jerome
Re: How-to divide float ?
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: How-to divide float ?
- From: Jerome
Re: abortive exiting
- From: HeyBub
Re: How-to divide float ?
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: How-to divide float ?
- From: Jerome
Re: How-to divide float ?
- From: Howard Brazee
How-to divide float ?
- From: Jerome
Re: abortive exiting
- From: Roger While
Re: Long numbers programming
- From: epc8
Re: Long numbers programming
- From: epc8
Re: Long numbers programming
- From: epc8
Re: abortive exiting
- From: Richard
Re: abortive exiting
- From: Frederico Fonseca
Re: Computer Science v. Computer Information Systems
- From: bforward
Re: abortive exiting
- From: Richard
Re: Whilst On The Road...
- From: Alistair
Re: Long numbers programming
- From: Peter Lacey
Re: [OT] Whilst On The Road...
- From: SkippyPB
Re: abortive exiting
- From: HeyBub
Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: abortive exiting
- From: Frederico Fonseca
Computer Science v. Computer Information Systems
- From: Perth
Re: abortive exiting
- From: Richard
Re: abortive exiting
- From: Richard
Re: Long numbers programming
- From: Michael Mattias
Re: abortive exiting
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: Long numbers programming
- From: Richard
Long numbers programming
- From: Peter Lacey
Re: abortive exiting
- From: Richard
Re: abortive exiting
- From: Richard
Re: abortive exiting
- From: Frederico Fonseca
abortive exiting
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: [OT] Whilst On The Road...
- From: Rick Smith
Re: Coprogrammers?
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: [OT] Whilst On The Road...
- From: SkippyPB
Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
- From: Howard Brazee
Cobol Research (was: Reverse Engineering a COBOL program)
- From: Niels
Re: Any comments? (Answers to Pete)
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: Any comments?
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: Any comments?
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: Any comments?
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: Any comments?
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: Any comments?
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: [OT] Whilst On The Road...
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: [OT] Whilst On The Road...
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: Put out to Pasture ?
- From: Clark Morris
Re: Whilst On The Road...
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Whilst On The Road...
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: [OT] Whilst On The Road...
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: [OT] Whilst On The Road...
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: [OT] Whilst On The Road...
- From: Donald Tees
Re: [OT] Whilst On The Road...
- From:
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Richard
Re: [OT] Whilst On The Road...
- From: Rick Smith
Re: Whilst On The Road...
- From: Rick Smith
Re: [OT] Whilst On The Road...
- From: SkippyPB
Re: Whilst On The Road...
- From: Peter Lacey
Re: Whilst On The Road...
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: [OT] Whilst On The Road...
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: [OT] Whilst On The Road...
- From: Frederico Fonseca
Re: Whilst On The Road...
- From: Alistair
Re: [OT] Whilst On The Road...
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: J4 (INCITS aka ANSI COBOL) Committee update
- From: CG
Re: [OT] Whilst On The Road...
- From: HeyBub
Re: Whilst On The Road...
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: [OT] Whilst On The Road...
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Whilst On The Road...
- From: Richard
Re: [OT] Whilst On The Road...
- From: SkippyPB
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: HeyBub
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: [OT] Whilst On The Road...
- From: Pete Dashwood
[OT] Whilst On The Road...
- From:
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: HeyBub
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: LX-i
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Richard
Re: Is threading the right solution for this challenge?
- From: Michael Wojcik
Re: on topic
- From: void * clvrmnky()
on topic
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Chuck Stevens
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: What could J4 (or WG4) do (was: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Karl Kiesel
Re: When is EBCDIC not EBCDIC ?
- From: William M. Klein
What could J4 (or WG4) do (was: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: William M. Klein
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Chuck Stevens
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: HeyBub
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Chuck Stevens
Re: J4 (INCITS aka ANSI COBOL) Committee update
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: When is EBCDIC not EBCDIC ?
- From: Michael Mattias
When is EBCDIC not EBCDIC ?
- From: Roger While
Re: COBOL FAQ
- From: Roger While
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: William M. Klein
Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
- From: Jeff Campbell
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Chuck Stevens
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Roger While
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: William M. Klein
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Robert Jones
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Chuck Stevens
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: William M. Klein
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Chuck Stevens
Re: J4 (INCITS aka ANSI COBOL) Committee update
- From: James J. Gavan
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Jeff Campbell
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Chuck Stevens
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Chuck Stevens
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Roger While
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: HeyBub
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: HeyBub
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: brain teaser
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: brain teaser
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: brain teaser
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Rick Smith
Re: J4 (INCITS aka ANSI COBOL) Committee update
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: J$ (INCITS aka ANSI COBOL) Committee update
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Roger While
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Roger While
Re: Put out to Pasture ?
- From: William M. Klein
Re: brain teaser
- From: HeyBub
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: HeyBub
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: brain teaser
- From: William M. Klein
Re: brain teaser
- From: William M. Klein
Re: brain teaser
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: brain teaser
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: J4 (INCITS aka ANSI COBOL) Committee update
- From: William M. Klein
Re: brain teaser
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: brain teaser
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: brain teaser
- From: Richard
Re: brain teaser
- From: Richard
Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
- From: Jeff Campbell
Re: brain teaser
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: brain teaser
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: brain teaser
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: brain teaser
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Chuck Stevens
Re: brain teaser
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: brain teaser
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: brain teaser
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: J$ (INCITS aka ANSI COBOL) Committee update
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: brain teaser
- From: Roberto
Re: brain teaser
- From: Günther De Vogelaere
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Chuck Stevens
Re: brain teaser
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: brain teaser
- From: Roger While
Re: brain teaser
- From: Roberto
Re: TSQ/TDQ purpose?
- From: Arnold Trembley
Re: INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: William M. Klein
Re: J$ (INCITS aka ANSI COBOL) Committee update
- From: James J. Gavan
J4 (INCITS aka ANSI COBOL) Committee update
- From: William M. Klein
INSPECT and TRAILING syntax
- From: Roger While
Re: J$ (INCITS aka ANSI COBOL) Committee update
- From: Roger While
Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
- From: William M. Klein
J$ (INCITS aka ANSI COBOL) Committee update
- From: William M. Klein
Re: brain teaser
- From: Oliver Wong
Re: brain teaser
- From: Richard
brain teaser
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: TSQ/TDQ purpose?
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: Coprogrammers?
- From: void * clvrmnky()
Re: [OT] Punching Out
- From: LX-i
Re: [OT] Punching Out
- From:
Re: Reverse Engineering a COBOL program
- From: gwlemyre@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Re: [OT] Punching Out
- From: James J. Gavan
Re: [OT] Punching Out
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Punching Out
- From: Holly
[OT] Punching Out
- From: LX-i
Re: IBM VSAM parameters was Re: Static or Dynamic Call.
- From: Joel C. Ewing
IBM VSAM parameters was Re: Static or Dynamic Call.
- From: Clark Morris
Re: (no subject)
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: [OT] Away For A Bit
- From: Pete Dashwood
[OT] Away For A Bit
- From:
Re: Static or Dynamic Call.
- From:
Re: Static or Dynamic Call.
- From: arrbee
Re: TSQ/TDQ purpose?
- From: Arnold Trembley
(no subject)
- From: James J. Gavan
Re: Static or Dynamic Call.
- From:
Re: Static or Dynamic Call.
- From: Joel C. Ewing
Re: cobol embedded sql source example
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
- From: James J. Gavan
Re: Is threading the right solution for this challenge?
- From: James J. Gavan
Re: TSQ/TDQ purpose?
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
- From:
Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
- From: Chris
Re: Reverse Engineering a COBOL program
- From: hcmason
Re: Reverse Engineering a COBOL program
- From: hcmason
Re: Reverse Engineering a COBOL program
- From: hcmason
Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: Is threading the right solution for this challenge?
- From: Chris
Re: 3-6 month contract in AL for a Senior Mainframe P/A with Cobol/CICS/DB2/VSAM
- From: grjiii
Re: cobol embedded sql source example
- From: Holly
[OT] Similarly, In Music
- From:
Re: cobol embedded sql source example
- From: Michael Mattias
Re: cobol embedded sql source example
- From:
Re: Is threading the right solution for this challenge?
- From: Richard
Re: Beautify code
- From: Steve Rainbird
Re: Calling a COBOL-DB2 program from a pure COBOL program.
- From: arrbee
Re: TSQ/TDQ purpose?
- From: Arnold Trembley
Re: Reverse Engineering a COBOL program
- From: Arnold Trembley
Re: Is threading the right solution for this challenge?
- From: Arnold Trembley
Re: Beautify code
- From: Arnold Trembley
Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
- From: Jeff Campbell
Re: cobol embedded sql source example
- From: Holly
Re: Calling a COBOL-DB2 program from a pure COBOL program.
- From:
Re: 3-6 month contract in AL for a Senior Mainframe P/A with Cobol/CICS/DB2/VSAM
- From:
Re: Static or Dynamic Call.
- From:
Re: Static or Dynamic Call.
- From: Clark Morris
Re: Static or Dynamic Call.
- From: Michael Mattias
Re: TSQ/TDQ purpose?
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: Static or Dynamic Call.
- From: Holly
Re: Calling a COBOL-DB2 program from a pure COBOL program.
- From: LX-i
Re: Call AcuCobol Program in Unix from Windows and obtain the output
- From: ray223
Re: Is threading the right solution for this challenge?
- From: James J. Gavan
3-6 month contract in AL for a Senior Mainframe P/A with Cobol/CICS/DB2/VSAM
- From: grjiii
Re: Is threading the right solution for this challenge?
- From: James J. Gavan
Re: Static or Dynamic Call.
- From: William M. Klein
Re: TSQ/TDQ purpose?
- From: William M. Klein
Re: Is threading the right solution for this challenge?
- From: Chris
Re: Is threading the right solution for this challenge?
- From: Oliver Wong
Re: Is threading the right solution for this challenge?
- From: Chris
Re: Call AcuCobol Program in Unix from Windows and obtain the output
- From: martin . olivares
Re: calling and called program making use of same DB2 table !!!???
- From:
Re: Static or Dynamic Call.
- From:
Re: OpenCobol 0.33 binaries
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: TSQ/TDQ purpose?
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: Jesus breaking the law was Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
- From: Alistair
Re: calling and called program making use of same DB2 table !!!???
- From: Alistair
Re: Calling a COBOL-DB2 program from a pure COBOL program.
- From: Andreas Lerch
Re: Is threading the right solution for this challenge?
- From: Oliver Wong
Re: Static or Dynamic Call.
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
- From: Peter Lacey
Re: Static or Dynamic Call.
- From:
Re: Static or Dynamic Call.
- From: Michael Mattias
Re: Static or Dynamic Call.
- From:
Re: Static or Dynamic Call.
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Static or Dynamic Call.
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: Static or Dynamic Call.
- From: Michael Mattias
Re: Static or Dynamic Call.
- From:
Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
- From:
Re: Static or Dynamic Call.
- From: Michael Mattias
Re: Static or Dynamic Call.
- From:
Re: calling and called program making use of same DB2 table !!!???
- From:
Re: TSQ/TDQ purpose?
- From:
Re: Calling a COBOL-DB2 program from a pure COBOL program.
- From:
Re: Calling a COBOL-DB2 program from a pure COBOL program.
- From: Binyamin Dissen
Re: Calling a COBOL-DB2 program from a pure COBOL program.
- From: Frederico Fonseca
Re: TSQ/TDQ purpose?
- From: arrbee
Re: OpenCobol 0.33 binaries
- From: Roger While
Re: TSQ/TDQ purpose?
- From: Arnold Trembley
Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
- From: Joe Zitzelberger
Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
- From: Joe Zitzelberger
Re: cobol embedded sql source example
- From: arrbee
Re: Static or Dynamic Call.
- From: arrbee
Re: Calling a COBOL-DB2 program from a pure COBOL program.
- From: arrbee
Re: calling and called program making use of same DB2 table !!!???
- From: arrbee
Re: TSQ/TDQ purpose?
- From: arrbee
Re: Calling a COBOL-DB2 program from a pure COBOL program.
- From: Don Leahy
Re: Static or Dynamic Call.
- From:
Re: end user "programming"
- From:
Re: Reverse Engineering a COBOL program
- From: Oliver Wong
Re: end user "programming"
- From: Peter Lacey
Re: Call AcuCobol Program in Unix from Windows and obtain the output
- From: ray223
Re: Static or Dynamic Call.
- From: Holly
Re: cobol embedded sql source example
- From: Michael Mattias
Call AcuCobol Program in Unix from Windows and obtain the output
- From: martin . olivares
Re: OpenCobol 0.33 binaries
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: Reverse Engineering a COBOL program
- From: Binyamin Dissen
Re: Reverse Engineering a COBOL program
- From: Donald Tees
Re: Calling a COBOL-DB2 program from a pure COBOL program.
- From: Andreas Lerch
Reverse Engineering a COBOL program
- From: hcmason
Re: cobol embedded sql source example
- From: Frederico Fonseca
OpenCobol 0.33 binaries
- From: Sergey Kashyrin
end user "programming"
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: cobol embedded sql source example
- From: Michael Mattias
Re: Calling a COBOL-DB2 program from a pure COBOL program.
- From:
Re: cobol embedded sql source example
- From: Binyamin Dissen
Re: Calling a COBOL-DB2 program from a pure COBOL program.
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: cobol embedded sql source example
- From: Michael Mattias
Re: Calling a COBOL-DB2 program from a pure COBOL program.
- From:
Re: cobol embedded sql source example
- From: Binyamin Dissen
Re: Static or Dynamic Call.
- From: Binyamin Dissen
Re: Calling a COBOL-DB2 program from a pure COBOL program.
- From: Binyamin Dissen
Re: TSQ/TDQ purpose?
- From: sgbojo
Re: cobol embedded sql source example
- From:
Re: cobol embedded sql source example
- From: Michael Mattias
Re: cobol embedded sql source example
- From:
Re: cobol embedded sql source example
- From:
Re: TSQ/TDQ purpose?
- From:
Re: calling and called program making use of same DB2 table !!!???
- From:
Re: Static or Dynamic Call.
- From:
Re: Calling a COBOL-DB2 program from a pure COBOL program.
- From:
Re: cobol embedded sql source example
- From: Günther De Vogelaere
Re: cobol embedded sql source example
- From: Michael Mattias
Re: cobol embedded sql source example
- From: arrbee
cobol embedded sql source example
- From: Serge Lacombe
TSQ/TDQ purpose?
- From: arrbee
Re: Is Tiny Cobl Kaput?
- From: Roger While
calling and called program making use of same DB2 table !!!???
- From: arrbee
Static or Dynamic Call.
- From: arrbee
Calling a COBOL-DB2 program from a pure COBOL program.
- From: arrbee
Re: University of Limerick still teaching Cobol
- From: Arnold Trembley
Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
- From: Frank Swarbrick
Re: Jesus breaking the law was Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: Jesus breaking the law was Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: [OT] WBC and one state's response
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: [OT] WBC and one state's response
- From: Howard Brazee
PLUG: txt2pdf 9.0
- From: mail
Re: How to accept multiple lines of Instream data.
- From: arrbee
Re: Jesus breaking the law was Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: How to accept multiple lines of Instream data.
- From: LX-i
Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
- From: Pete Dashwood
Re: How to accept multiple lines of Instream data.
- From: Roberto
Re: How to accept multiple lines of Instream data.
- From: arrbee
Re: How to accept multiple lines of Instream data.
- From:
Re: Coprogrammers?
- From:
Re: How to accept multiple lines of Instream data.
- From: arrbee
Re: How to accept multiple lines of Instream data.
- From: arrbee
Re: How to accept multiple lines of Instream data.
- From: arrbee
Re: Jesus breaking the law was Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
- From: Joel C. Ewing
Re: [OT] WBC and one state's response
- From: LX-i
Coprogrammers?
- From: HeyBub
Re: Is Tiny Cobl Kaput?
- From: David Essex
Re: Prodcuing an output file only on Friday?
- From: Jeff Campbell
OT: Re: Jesus breaking the law was Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
- From: Clark Morris
Is threading the right solution for this challenge?
- From: Chris
Re: Jesus breaking the law was Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: IBM file status 97 (was: Prodcuing an output file only onFriday?
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: How to accept multiple lines of Instream data.
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: "Philosphical" question on "succesful" file status testing
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: "Philosphical" question on "succesful" file status testing
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: [OT] WBC and one state's response
- From: Howard Brazee
Re: Jesus breaking the law was Re: US Presidents; an outside view WAS: Any comments? (Evolution - was Answers to Pete)
- From: Pete Dashwood
Is Tiny Cobl Kaput?
- From: John Culleton
Re: "Philosphical" question on "succesful" file status testing
- From: Robert Jones