Re: TSQ/TDQ purpose?
- From: "William M. Klein" <wmklein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 19:56:22 GMT
I have deleted all the comments (some of which were very useful/interesting) and
just wanted to mention that for those on z/OS (sorry about that Frank <G>), you
might want to look at "channels" available with CICS TS 3.1. Although targeted
at "greater than 32K commareas", I think they might also be useful for some of
what historically went into TSQ/TDQ.
They may also be useful for those getting into XML - as they provide
"auto-magic" UTF (Unicode) conversion facilities.
NOTE:
I have no personal experience with them, but did think they look interesting.
--
Bill Klein
wmklein <at> ix.netcom.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: TSQ/TDQ purpose?
- From: Frank Swarbrick
- Re: TSQ/TDQ purpose?
- References:
- TSQ/TDQ purpose?
- From: arrbee
- Re: TSQ/TDQ purpose?
- From: sgbojo
- Re: TSQ/TDQ purpose?
- From: Arnold Trembley
- TSQ/TDQ purpose?
- Prev by Date: Re: Is threading the right solution for this challenge?
- Next by Date: Re: Static or Dynamic Call.
- Previous by thread: Re: TSQ/TDQ purpose?
- Next by thread: Re: TSQ/TDQ purpose?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|