Re: Misnomers in the COBOL standard
- From: "Rick Smith" <ricksmith@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 19:58:30 -0400
"William M. Klein" <wmklein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:10ytg.112439$az.70432@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
You have to hear the "present" to understand that it is (intended) to be:developed. I
"present" - as in give forth or show (cf. "present an award")
and NOT
"present" as in "not absent"
There was LOTS of discussion about this when the '02 Standard was
am NOT disagreeing that there is a "problem" - but did want you tounderstand
HOW it came about.
And, sometime after J4 had their discussion, I had one,
using e-mail, with Mr Piggot and Mr Hubbell where all
that was explained; so I will disagree that I "have to hear
the 'present' to understand". Having heard it with my own
voice, I still don't understand. <G>
Perhaps someone could rewrite the introduction to remove
the idea of "selection", replacing it with the idea of
"presentation". Maybe then it will become sensible, to me;
though I doubt it, since I seem unable to grasp the meaning
of "presenting data description entries to a VALIDATE
statement", while "selecting data description entries for a
VALIDATE statement" makes perfect sense.
[The introduction actually states "The PRESENT WHEN
clause also enables conditional selection of data description
entries by the VALIDATE statement."]
.
- References:
- Misnomers in the COBOL standard
- From: Roger While
- Re: Misnomers in the COBOL standard
- From: Rick Smith
- Re: Misnomers in the COBOL standard
- From: William M. Klein
- Misnomers in the COBOL standard
- Prev by Date: Re: Misnomers in the COBOL standard
- Next by Date: Re: change variables
- Previous by thread: Re: Misnomers in the COBOL standard
- Next by thread: Re: Misnomers in the COBOL standard
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|