Re: Whacko Russian Declines Field Medal
- From: "HeyBub" <heybubNOSPAM@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 08:22:12 -0500
Albino Timberwolf wrote:
I'm allergic to chocolate. Could this same proof work on a marshmallow
rabbit? Perhaps a rabbit from a box of animal crackers. Then I would
not have to wait until Easter.
Alternatively, super glue and duct tape exist. A rabbit does not have
to have holes.
Further, must it be a rabbit? The "famed" object of an old magicians
hat trick? Why not another animal? Does it state in this proof that
is must be a mammal? I'd love to take some duct tape and super glue
to that damned Geico lizard. I'd save even more on my car insurance
if those monsters (expletive replaced) wouldn't waste so much money
on advertising!
Yes, a rabbit is required. The "Schrodinger's cat" hypothesis just wouldn't
work if it were promoted as "Schrodinger's Star-nosed Mole" (
http://www.naturalhistorymag.com/features/0600_feature2.html ).
.
- References:
- Whacko Russian Declines Field Medal
- From: HeyBub
- Whacko Russian Declines Field Medal
- Prev by Date: Re: Whacko Russian Declines Field Medal
- Next by Date: Re: Whacko Russian Declines Field Medal
- Previous by thread: Re: Whacko Russian Declines Field Medal
- Next by thread: Random number generator
- Index(es):