Re: EBCDIC to ASCII OPTCD=Q? (JCL)
- From: "Rick Smith" <ricksmith@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 15:36:32 -0400
"Alistair" <alistair@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1158940474.290347.95400@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Rick Smith wrote:
"Alistair" <alistair@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1158774662.910290.181790@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[snip]
I notice you don't have privates in
the army but that everyone is a "specialist".
Privates are E-1 through E-3. Specialists are E-4
through E-7. It is probably true that the number of
Specialists exceeds the number of Privates; but it is
true that every Specialist was once a Private. At one
point, the time-in-service requirement for E-4 was
one year, thus Privates may reach their time-in-service
prior to, or soon after, deployment overseas.
Promotions during training and assignment in the US,
may be why you don't notice Privates but do notice
"that everyone is a 'specialist'".
I think you are right.
As I discovered, I was mistaken in some respects;
including that the time-in-service requirement for
Specialist is now two years with an exception for
certain college graduates.
However, the way that I first heard it was that
privates were demoralised by not being valued, so the term specialist
was dreamed up to make them feel.... special.
The history of the Specialist rank (posted separately)
would seem to refute that; that is, Specialist has always
been a rank Privates reach as their 'value' increases.
The current exception being those who enter the
US Army with a four-year degree and receive the rank
of Specialist upon entry. Perhaps a four-year degree
has value. <g>
.
- References:
- [OT] EBCDIC to ASCII OPTCD=Q? (JCL)
- From:
- Re: EBCDIC to ASCII OPTCD=Q? (JCL)
- From: Alistair
- Re: EBCDIC to ASCII OPTCD=Q? (JCL)
- From:
- Re: EBCDIC to ASCII OPTCD=Q? (JCL)
- From: Alistair
- Re: EBCDIC to ASCII OPTCD=Q? (JCL)
- From: Rick Smith
- Re: EBCDIC to ASCII OPTCD=Q? (JCL)
- From: Alistair
- [OT] EBCDIC to ASCII OPTCD=Q? (JCL)
- Prev by Date: Re: OT typical salary scale for COBOL mainframe programmers
- Next by Date: Re: OT typical salary scale for COBOL mainframe programmers
- Previous by thread: Re: EBCDIC to ASCII OPTCD=Q? (JCL)
- Next by thread: Re: EBCDIC to ASCII OPTCD=Q? (JCL)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|