comp.lang.cobol

• Date Index

• Got a COBOL job, Impy
  • Re: Got a COBOL job, Kelly Bert Manning
  • Re: Got a COBOL job,
    • Re: Got a COBOL job, HeyBub
      • Re: Got a COBOL job, Impy
  • Re: Got a COBOL job, Robert Jones
• Re: Examples of Web sites backed by COBOL, Tim Boyer
• cobolc, Gil
  • Re: cobolc, Pete Dashwood
    • Re: cobolc, Gil
• AcuODBC, Daniele F.
• Read a XML document in COBOL, olivierdeman
  • Re: Read a XML document in COBOL, LX-i
  • Re: Read a XML document in COBOL, Richard
    • Re: Read a XML document in COBOL, Richard
    • Re: Read a XML document in COBOL, Richard
    • Re: Read a XML document in COBOL, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Read a XML document in COBOL, Richard
  • Re: Read a XML document in COBOL, Pete Dashwood
• [OT] Happy Thanksgiving!, LX-i
  • Re: [OT] Happy Thanksgiving!, Robin Lee
  • Re: [OT] Happy Thanksgiving!, Mark Wallace
    • Re: Happy Thanksgiving!, Alistair
      • Re: Happy Thanksgiving!, Mark Wallace
    • Re: [OT] Happy Thanksgiving!, LX-i
  • Re: [OT] Happy Thanksgiving!, Pete Dashwood
    • Re: [OT] Happy Thanksgiving!, HeyBub
      • Re: [OT] Happy Thanksgiving!, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Happy Thanksgiving!, Alistair
      • Re: Happy Thanksgiving!, SkippyPB
      • Re: Happy Thanksgiving!, Alistair
      • Re: Happy Thanksgiving!, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Happy Thanksgiving!, SkippyPB
      • Re: Happy Thanksgiving!, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Happy Thanksgiving!, HeyBub
      • Re: Happy Thanksgiving!, LX-i
      • Re: Happy Thanksgiving!, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: [OT] Happy Thanksgiving!, SkippyPB
    • Re: [OT] Happy Thanksgiving!, LX-i
      • Re: [OT] Happy Thanksgiving!, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: [OT] Happy Thanksgiving!, Robin Lee
      • Re: [OT] Happy Thanksgiving!, LX-i
      • Re: [OT] Happy Thanksgiving!, Howard Brazee
      • Re: Happy Thanksgiving!, Alistair
      • Re: [OT] Happy Thanksgiving!, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: [OT] Happy Thanksgiving!, LX-i
• Report help, jeff
  • Re: Report help, Howard Brazee
    • Re: Report help, jeff
  • Re: Report help, Pete Dashwood
  • Re: Report help, LX-i
    • Re: Report help,
      • Re: Report help, LX-i
      • Re: Report help,
      • Re: Report help, Howard Brazee
• OT: LOTR Spoiler, Alistair
  • Re: LOTR Spoiler, Pete Dashwood
• The Maximum Beta release of COBOL Millennium Edition, Mark Wallace
  • Re: The Maximum Beta release of COBOL Millennium Edition, Pete Dashwood
    • Re: The Maximum Beta release of COBOL Millennium Edition, Mark Wallace
  • Re: The Maximum Beta release of COBOL Millennium Edition, Alistair
    • Re: The Maximum Beta release of COBOL Millennium Edition, Mark Wallace
• COBOL...to be, or not to be..., Pete Dashwood
  • Re: COBOL...to be, or not to be..., P. Raulerson
    • Re: COBOL...to be, or not to be..., P. Raulerson
      • Re: COBOL...to be, or not to be..., Pete Dashwood
    • Re: COBOL...to be, or not to be..., Pete Dashwood
• [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?,
  • Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, Pete Dashwood
    • Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, HeyBub
      • Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?,
      • Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, HeyBub
      • Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?,
      • Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, HeyBub
      • Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?,
      • Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, HeyBub
      • Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?,
      • Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, Howard Brazee
      • Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?,
      • Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, Howard Brazee
      • Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?,
      • Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, LX-i
      • Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?,
      • Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, HeyBub
      • Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?,
      • Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?,
      • Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, Alistair
      • Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?,
      • Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, Alistair
      • Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, HeyBub
      • Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, Donald Tees
      • Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, HeyBub
      • Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, Alistair
      • Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, HeyBub
      • [Very OT] waxing poetical WAS Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: waxing poetical WAS Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, Alistair
      • Re: waxing poetical WAS Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: waxing poetical WAS Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, Alistair
      • Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, Mark Wallace
      • Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, Mark Wallace
      • Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, Mark Wallace
      • Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, Alistair
      • Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, Mark Wallace
      • Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?,
      • Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, Alistair
      • Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, Alistair
      • Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, Howard Brazee
      • Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, HeyBub
      • Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, Alistair
      • Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, Howard Brazee
      • Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, Michael Mattias
      • Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, Howard Brazee
      • Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, HeyBub
      • Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, Howard Brazee
      • Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, HeyBub
      • Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, Howard Brazee
      • Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, LX-i
      • Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, Alistair
      • Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?,
      • Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, Alistair
      • Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?,
      • Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, Alistair
      • Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?,
      • Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, Alistair
      • Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, Alistair
      • Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, Alistair
      • Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, Pete Dashwood
      • Message not available
      • Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, Pete Dashwood
      • Message not available
      • Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?,
    • Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?,
      • Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?,
  • Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, HeyBub
    • Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, LX-i
      • Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?, Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL compiler written in COBOL (source code), Brian W Spoor
  • Re: COBOL compiler written in COBOL (source code),
  • Re: COBOL compiler written in COBOL (source code), Arnold Trembley
• Re: JOB OPPORTUNITIES, Kevin M
  • Re: JOB OPPORTUNITIES, Pete Dashwood
  • Re: JOB OPPORTUNITIES, LX-i
    • Re: JOB OPPORTUNITIES,
• CSAML, Frank Swarbrick
  • Re: CSAML, Alistair
    • Re: CSAML, Pete Dashwood
  • Re: CSAML, Robin Lee
    • Re: CSAML, Pete Dashwood
  • Re: CSAML, Pete Dashwood
• Re: Limit on Arrays on Enterpresie Cobol in Z sereis, Robert Jones
  • Re: Limit on Arrays on Enterpresie Cobol in Z sereis,
    • Re: Limit on Arrays on Enterpresie Cobol in Z sereis, HeyBub
      • Re: Limit on Arrays on Enterpresie Cobol in Z sereis, Joel C. Ewing
      • Re: Limit on Arrays on Enterpresie Cobol in Z sereis, HeyBub
      • Re: Limit on Arrays on Enterpresie Cobol in Z sereis, Binyamin Dissen
      • Re: Limit on Arrays on Enterpresie Cobol in Z sereis,
    • Re: Limit on Arrays on Enterpresie Cobol in Z sereis, Robert Jones
      • Re: Limit on Arrays on Enterpresie Cobol in Z sereis, Binyamin Dissen
      • Re: Limit on Arrays on Enterpresie Cobol in Z sereis,
  • Re: Limit on Arrays on Enterpresie Cobol in Z sereis, Robert Jones
• Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance., Clark F Morris
  • Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance., Howard Brazee
  • Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance., Pete Dashwood
    • Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance., Alistair
    • CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance., Clark F Morris
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance., Pete Dashwood
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance., William M. Klein
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance., Clark F Morris
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance., LX-i
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance., Arnold Trembley
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance., Alistair
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance., Howard Brazee
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance., Pete Dashwood
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance., Arnold Trembley
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance., Pete Dashwood
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.,
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance., Pete Dashwood
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.,
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance., Pete Dashwood
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.,
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance., Alistair
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.,
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance., Alistair
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.,
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance., Mark Wallace
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.,
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance., Mark Wallace
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance., Pete Dashwood
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.,
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance., Howard Brazee
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance., Pete Dashwood
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance., Mark Wallace
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance., Donald Tees
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance., Howard Brazee
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance., Pete Dashwood
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance., Pete Dashwood
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.,
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance., Mark Wallace
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance., Pete Dashwood
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.,
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance., Alistair
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.,
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance., Alistair
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.,
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance., Alistair
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.,
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance., Pete Dashwood
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.,
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance., Howard Brazee
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.,
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance., Pete Dashwood
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.,
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance., Howard Brazee
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance., Mark Wallace
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.,
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance., Mark Wallace
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.,
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance., Howard Brazee
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance., Pete Dashwood
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance., Pete Dashwood
      • Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance., Pete Dashwood
    • IBM mainframe and OO was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance., Clark F Morris
      • Re: IBM mainframe and OO was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance., Pete Dashwood
      • Autocoupling and brakes was Re: IBM mainframe and OO was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance., Clark F Morris
      • Re: Autocoupling and brakes was Re: IBM mainframe and OO was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance., Pete Dashwood
• CANCEL Mis-behaving, Chris
  • Re: CANCEL Mis-behaving, Howard Brazee
    • Re: CANCEL Mis-behaving, Chris
      • Re: CANCEL Mis-behaving, Howard Brazee
  • Re: CANCEL Mis-behaving, Richard
    • Re: CANCEL Mis-behaving, Chris
      • Re: CANCEL Mis-behaving, Chris
  • Re: CANCEL Mis-behaving, Pete Dashwood
    • Re: CANCEL Mis-behaving, Chris
      • Re: CANCEL Mis-behaving, HeyBub
  • Re: CANCEL Mis-behaving, Frank Swarbrick
    • Re: CANCEL Mis-behaving, Chris
  • Re: CANCEL Mis-behaving, William M. Klein
    • Re: CANCEL Mis-behaving, Chris
      • Re: CANCEL Mis-behaving, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: CANCEL Mis-behaving, Chris
      • Re: CANCEL Mis-behaving, HeyBub
      • Re: CANCEL Mis-behaving, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: CANCEL Mis-behaving, Roger While
      • Re: CANCEL Mis-behaving, Michael Russell
  • Re: CANCEL Mis-behaving, Nigel Eaton
• For Firefox users., HeyBub
  • Re: For Firefox users., Pete Dashwood
    • Re: For Firefox users., gary drummond
    • Re: For Firefox users., SkippyPB
• Display Line Position, jdobem
  • Re: Display Line Position, t . morrison
    • Re: Display Line Position, Frederico Fonseca
• Re: First Posting, Pete Dashwood
• Y2K is Back!, HeyBub
  • Re: Y2K is Back!, Michael Mattias
• 2 to 4 year project - Micro Focus Cobol - Apply with resume, requirements
  • Re: 2 to 4 year project - Micro Focus Cobol - Apply with resume,
• NetExpess 3.0 calling MSMQ, smonchunski
• Re: COBOL KEY SEGMENTS, Rick Smith
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: COBOL KEY SEGMENTS, Vaclav Snajdr
  • Re: COBOL KEY SEGMENTS, Richard
    • Re: COBOL KEY SEGMENTS, William M. Klein
      • Re: COBOL KEY SEGMENTS, LX-i
  • Re: COBOL KEY SEGMENTS, HeyBub
    • Re: COBOL KEY SEGMENTS, alexandretalbert@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: COBOL KEY SEGMENTS, nelsonsoft
• File Status 46 abend, padair . o . ceallaigh
  • Re: File Status 46 abend, Thomas
    • Re: File Status 46 abend, Clark F Morris
  • Re: File Status 46 abend, padair . o . ceallaigh
• VSAM Error Code 04, SkippyPB
  • Re: VSAM Error Code 04, Clark F Morris
  • Re: VSAM Error Code 04, Richard
    • Re: VSAM Error Code 04, Howard Brazee
  • Re: VSAM Error Code 04, Richard
  • Re: VSAM Error Code 04, William M. Klein
  • Re: VSAM Error Code 04, Frank Swarbrick
    • Re: VSAM Error Code 04, SkippyPB
      • Re: VSAM Error Code 04, Richard
• OT: Job References; are they any real value?, Pete Dashwood
  • Re: Job References; are they any real value?, Michael Mattias
  • Re: Job References; are they any real value?, Charles Hottel
    • Re: Job References; are they any real value?, Alistair
      • Re: Job References; are they any real value?, Marty
  • Re: OT: Job References; are they any real value?,
• problem w/READ INTO in COBOL/VSE?, Frank Swarbrick
  • Re: problem w/READ INTO in COBOL/VSE?, Howard Brazee
    • Re: problem w/READ INTO in COBOL/VSE?, Howard Brazee
    • Re: problem w/READ INTO in COBOL/VSE?, Frank Swarbrick
      • Re: problem w/READ INTO in COBOL/VSE?, Robert Jones
      • Re: problem w/READ INTO in COBOL/VSE?, Richard
  • Re: problem w/READ INTO in COBOL/VSE?, Alistair
    • Re: problem w/READ INTO in COBOL/VSE?, William M. Klein
      • Re: problem w/READ INTO in COBOL/VSE?, Alistair
      • Re: problem w/READ INTO in COBOL/VSE?, Richard
      • Re: problem w/READ INTO in COBOL/VSE?, William M. Klein
  • Re: problem w/READ INTO in COBOL/VSE?, SkippyPB
  • Re: problem w/READ INTO in COBOL/VSE?, Frank Swarbrick
• OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Charles Hottel
  • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on,
    • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Charles Hottel
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on,
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Charles Hottel
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Donald Tees
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Howard Brazee
    • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on,
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Charles Hottel
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Charles Hottel
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, SkippyPB
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, HeyBub
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Donald Tees
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Richard
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Richard
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Howard Brazee
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, HeyBub
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Howard Brazee
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Alistair
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Donald Tees
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, HeyBub
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Richard
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Howard Brazee
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, HeyBub
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on,
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, HeyBub
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Frank Swarbrick
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, HeyBub
      • Web site compatibility was Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Clark F Morris
      • Web site compatibility was Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Frank Swarbrick
      • Re: Web site compatibility was Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on,
      • Re: Web site compatibility was Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Howard Brazee
      • Re: Web site compatibility was Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Frank Swarbrick
      • Re: Web site compatibility was Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on,
      • Re: Web site compatibility was Re: OT: windoze woes and full rantmode is on, Charles Hottel
      • Re: Web site compatibility was Re: OT: windoze woes and full rantmode is on,
      • Re: Web site compatibility was Re: OT: windoze woes and full rantmode is on, HeyBub
      • Re: Web site compatibility was Re: OT: windoze woes and full rantmode is on, LX-i
      • Re: Web site compatibility was Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Howard Brazee
      • Re: Web site compatibility was Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Oliver Wong
      • Re: Web site compatibility was Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Richard
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Oliver Wong
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Alistair
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Oliver Wong
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Howard Brazee
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Oliver Wong
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Howard Brazee
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Oliver Wong
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, LX-i
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on,
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, LX-i
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on,
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, LX-i
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Donald Tees
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Richard
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, LX-i
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Richard
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on,
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Howard Brazee
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on,
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, LX-i
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on,
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Howard Brazee
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on,
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Howard Brazee
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on,
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, LX-i
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on,
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Oliver Wong
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, LX-i
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Howard Brazee
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, LX-i
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on,
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, SkippyPB
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Oliver Wong
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Howard Brazee
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, HeyBub
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Howard Brazee
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Pete Dashwood
  • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Robin Lee
    • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Michael Mattias
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Robin Lee
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Robin Lee
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Robin Lee
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Pete Dashwood
      • OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, William M. Klein
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Robin Lee
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, William M. Klein
      • Re: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, HeyBub
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Richard
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Alistair
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Richard
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Alistair
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, HeyBub
      • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Howard Brazee
    • Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Charles Hottel
  • Re: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, HeyBub
    • Re: windoze woes and full rant mode is on, Richard
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol, some
  • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, HeyBub
    • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, Richard
    • Re: advice on books to learn cobol,
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, some
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol,
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, William M. Klein
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, some
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, Robin Lee
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, some
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol,
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, some
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol,
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, some
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol,
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, HeyBub
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, Alistair
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol,
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, Howard Brazee
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, HeyBub
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, William M. Klein
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, Clark F Morris
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, Oliver Wong
      • Public domain was Re: advice on books to learn cobol, Clark F Morris
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, Oliver Wong
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, Richard
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, Frank Swarbrick
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, Howard Brazee
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, Oliver Wong
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, Alistair
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, Oliver Wong
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, Howard Brazee
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol,
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, HeyBub
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol,
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, Howard Brazee
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol,
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, HeyBub
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, Alistair
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol,
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol,
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, HeyBub
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, Alistair
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, Howard Brazee
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol,
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, Binyamin Dissen
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, Charles Hottel
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, some
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, Charles Hottel
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, Charles Hottel
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, some
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol,
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, Charles Hottel
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol,
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, Charles Hottel
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol,
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, Alistair
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol,
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, Charles Hottel
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, Charles Hottel
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, Charles Hottel
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, Alistair
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, Charles Hottel
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, some
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol,
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, Charles Hottel
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, Howard Brazee
      • Re: advice on books to learn cobol, Alistair
• Re: Development and offshoring was Re: IBM file status 97 (was: Prodcuing an output file onlyonFriday?, Pete Dashwood
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Development and offshoring was Re: IBM file status 97 (was: Prodcuing an output file onlyonFriday?, Pete Dashwood
    • Re: Development and offshoring was Re: IBM file status 97 (was: Prodcuing an output file onlyonFriday?,
      • Re: Development and offshoring was Re: IBM file status 97 (was: Prodcuing an output file onlyonFriday?, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Development and offshoring was Re: IBM file status 97 (was: Prodcuing an output file onlyonFriday?, Alistair
      • Re: Development and offshoring was Re: IBM file status 97 (was: Prodcuing an output file onlyonFriday?, Pete Dashwood
      • Re: Development and offshoring was Re: IBM file status 97 (was: Prodcuing an output file onlyonFriday?,
• Re: Single Source CICS/Batch, Frank Swarbrick
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Single Source CICS/Batch, Charles Hottel
  • Re: Single Source CICS/Batch, Charles Hottel
• Re: 173 Called program not found in drive/directory, Vaclav Snajdr

• Security
• UNIX
• Linux
• Coding
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint