comp.lang.cobol

• Thread Index

• Re: Got a COBOL job
  • From: Robert Jones
• Re: Got a COBOL job
  • From: Impy
• Re: Got a COBOL job
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Got a COBOL job
  • From:
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Got a COBOL job
  • From: Kelly Bert Manning
• Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: HeyBub
• Got a COBOL job
  • From: Impy
• Re: Happy Thanksgiving!
  • From: Alistair
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Happy Thanksgiving!
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: cobolc
  • From: Gil
• Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: waxing poetical WAS Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Happy Thanksgiving!
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: Mark Wallace
• Re: Examples of Web sites backed by COBOL
  • From: Tim Boyer
• Re: Happy Thanksgiving!
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: waxing poetical WAS Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: Mark Wallace
• Re: Happy Thanksgiving!
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: waxing poetical WAS Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: Mark Wallace
• Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Read a XML document in COBOL
  • From: Richard
• Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From:
• Re: cobolc
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Read a XML document in COBOL
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Read a XML document in COBOL
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Happy Thanksgiving!
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Happy Thanksgiving!
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: Mark Wallace
• Re: Happy Thanksgiving!
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• [Very OT] waxing poetical WAS Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• cobolc
  • From: Gil
• Re: Read a XML document in COBOL
  • From: Richard
• Re: Read a XML document in COBOL
  • From: Richard
• Re: Read a XML document in COBOL
  • From: Richard
• AcuODBC
  • From: Daniele F.
• Re: Happy Thanksgiving!
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Happy Thanksgiving!
  • From: LX-i
• Re: [OT] Happy Thanksgiving!
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Read a XML document in COBOL
  • From: LX-i
• Re: [OT] Happy Thanksgiving!
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Happy Thanksgiving!
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: [OT] Happy Thanksgiving!
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Happy Thanksgiving!
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: [OT] Happy Thanksgiving!
  • From: Robin Lee
• Read a XML document in COBOL
  • From: olivierdeman
• Re: [OT] Happy Thanksgiving!
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Happy Thanksgiving!
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: [OT] Happy Thanksgiving!
  • From: LX-i
• Re: [OT] Happy Thanksgiving!
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: [OT] Happy Thanksgiving!
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: [OT] Happy Thanksgiving!
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Happy Thanksgiving!
  • From: Mark Wallace
• Re: Happy Thanksgiving!
  • From: Alistair
• Re: [OT] Happy Thanksgiving!
  • From: Mark Wallace
• Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: [OT] Happy Thanksgiving!
  • From: Robin Lee
• [OT] Happy Thanksgiving!
  • From: LX-i
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From:
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From: Mark Wallace
• Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From:
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From:
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From:
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From: Mark Wallace
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From: Mark Wallace
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From: Mark Wallace
• Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From:
• Re: Report help
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From:
• Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Report help
  • From:
• Re: Report help
  • From: LX-i
• Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From:
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From:
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From:
• Re: Report help
  • From:
• Re: Report help
  • From: LX-i
• Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Report help
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From:
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From:
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From:
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From: Mark Wallace
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From: Alistair
• Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Report help
  • From: jeff
• Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Report help
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Report help
  • From: jeff
• Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From:
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From:
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From:
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From:
• Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From:
• Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From:
• Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From:
• Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From:
• Re: LOTR Spoiler
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: LX-i
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From: Mark Wallace
• Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From: Alistair
• Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• OT: LOTR Spoiler
  • From: Alistair
• Re: The Maximum Beta release of COBOL Millennium Edition
  • From: Mark Wallace
• Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From:
• Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From:
• Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From:
• Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: The Maximum Beta release of COBOL Millennium Edition
  • From: Alistair
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From:
• Re: The Maximum Beta release of COBOL Millennium Edition
  • From: Mark Wallace
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From: Alistair
• Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From:
• Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL...to be, or not to be...
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL...to be, or not to be...
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From:
• Re: COBOL...to be, or not to be...
  • From: P. Raulerson
• Re: COBOL...to be, or not to be...
  • From: P. Raulerson
• Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: LX-i
• Re: The Maximum Beta release of COBOL Millennium Edition
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From:
• Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From:
• Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• The Maximum Beta release of COBOL Millennium Edition
  • From: Mark Wallace
• Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From:
• Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From:
• Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: HeyBub
• COBOL...to be, or not to be...
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
  • From:
• Re: COBOL compiler written in COBOL (source code)
  • From: Arnold Trembley
• Re: COBOL compiler written in COBOL (source code)
  • From:
• Re: COBOL compiler written in COBOL (source code)
  • From: Brian W Spoor
• Re: JOB OPPORTUNITIES
  • From:
• Re: JOB OPPORTUNITIES
  • From: LX-i
• Re: JOB OPPORTUNITIES
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: JOB OPPORTUNITIES
  • From: Kevin M
• Re: Autocoupling and brakes was Re: IBM mainframe and OO was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From: Alistair
• Autocoupling and brakes was Re: IBM mainframe and OO was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From: Clark F Morris
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From:
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: IBM mainframe and OO was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From:
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From:
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From: Arnold Trembley
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From: Arnold Trembley
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From: LX-i
• Re: CANCEL Mis-behaving
  • From: Michael Russell
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From: Clark F Morris
• IBM mainframe and OO was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From: Clark F Morris
• Re: CANCEL Mis-behaving
  • From: Roger While
• Re: CANCEL Mis-behaving
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: CANCEL Mis-behaving
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: CANCEL Mis-behaving
  • From: Chris
• Re: CANCEL Mis-behaving
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: CANCEL Mis-behaving
  • From: HeyBub
• CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From: Clark F Morris
• Re: CANCEL Mis-behaving
  • From: Chris
• Re: CANCEL Mis-behaving
  • From: Chris
• Re: CANCEL Mis-behaving
  • From: Chris
• Re: Limit on Arrays on Enterpresie Cobol in Z sereis
  • From: Robert Jones
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Limit on Arrays on Enterpresie Cobol in Z sereis
  • From:
• Re: Limit on Arrays on Enterpresie Cobol in Z sereis
  • From:
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From:
• Re: CSAML
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: CSAML
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: CSAML
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Richard
• Re: CSAML
  • From: Robin Lee
• Re: Limit on Arrays on Enterpresie Cobol in Z sereis
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: CSAML
  • From: Alistair
• CSAML
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: Web site compatibility was Re: OT: windoze woes and full rantmode is on
  • From: LX-i
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: LX-i
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: LX-i
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: LX-i
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: LX-i
• Re: CANCEL Mis-behaving
  • From: Nigel Eaton
• Re: Limit on Arrays on Enterpresie Cobol in Z sereis
  • From: Binyamin Dissen
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Limit on Arrays on Enterpresie Cobol in Z sereis
  • From: Robert Jones
• Re: Limit on Arrays on Enterpresie Cobol in Z sereis
  • From: Binyamin Dissen
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: Alistair
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From: Alistair
• Re: For Firefox users.
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: Limit on Arrays on Enterpresie Cobol in Z sereis
  • From: Joel C. Ewing
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Web site compatibility was Re: OT: windoze woes and full rantmode is on
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Limit on Arrays on Enterpresie Cobol in Z sereis
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Limit on Arrays on Enterpresie Cobol in Z sereis
  • From:
• Re: Web site compatibility was Re: OT: windoze woes and full rantmode is on
  • From:
• Re: Limit on Arrays on Enterpresie Cobol in Z sereis
  • From: Robert Jones
• Re: For Firefox users.
  • From: gary drummond
• Re: CANCEL Mis-behaving
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Web site compatibility was Re: OT: windoze woes and full rantmode is on
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From:
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From:
• Re: CANCEL Mis-behaving
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: CANCEL Mis-behaving
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: For Firefox users.
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: CANCEL Mis-behaving
  • From: Chris
• Re: CANCEL Mis-behaving
  • From: Chris
• Re: CANCEL Mis-behaving
  • From: Richard
• Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: CANCEL Mis-behaving
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: CANCEL Mis-behaving
  • From: Chris
• Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
  • From: Clark F Morris
• Re: Display Line Position
  • From: Frederico Fonseca
• Re: CANCEL Mis-behaving
  • From: Howard Brazee
• CANCEL Mis-behaving
  • From: Chris
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From:
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From:
• For Firefox users.
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From:
• Re: Display Line Position
  • From: t . morrison
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From:
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From:
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From:
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From:
• Display Line Position
  • From: jdobem
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From:
• Re: Web site compatibility was Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From:
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Richard
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: COBOL KEY SEGMENTS
  • From: LX-i
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: LX-i
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: LX-i
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: First Posting
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: LX-i
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Web site compatibility was Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: 2 to 4 year project - Micro Focus Cobol - Apply with resume
  • From:
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From:
• Re: COBOL KEY SEGMENTS
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: Y2K is Back!
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Y2K is Back!
  • From: HeyBub
• 2 to 4 year project - Micro Focus Cobol - Apply with resume
  • From: requirements
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: Web site compatibility was Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Richard
• NetExpess 3.0 calling MSMQ
  • From: smonchunski
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: Alistair
• Re: COBOL KEY SEGMENTS
  • From: nelsonsoft
• Re: COBOL KEY SEGMENTS
  • From: alexandretalbert@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Web site compatibility was Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: COBOL KEY SEGMENTS
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: Web site compatibility was Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: Web site compatibility was Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: COBOL KEY SEGMENTS
  • From: Richard
• Public domain was Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: Clark F Morris
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: COBOL KEY SEGMENTS
  • From: Vaclav Snajdr
• Re: COBOL KEY SEGMENTS
  • From: Rick Smith
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From:
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: LX-i
• Re: Web site compatibility was Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From:
• Web site compatibility was Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: Alistair
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Alistair
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Alistair
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: Richard
• Re: VSAM Error Code 04
  • From: Richard
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: VSAM Error Code 04
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From:
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Oliver Wong
• Re: VSAM Error Code 04
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: File Status 46 abend
  • From: padair . o . ceallaigh
• Web site compatibility was Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Clark F Morris
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: File Status 46 abend
  • From: Clark F Morris
• Re: File Status 46 abend
  • From: Thomas
• File Status 46 abend
  • From: padair . o . ceallaigh
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Richard
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: VSAM Error Code 04
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: VSAM Error Code 04
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: VSAM Error Code 04
  • From: Richard
• Re: VSAM Error Code 04
  • From: Richard
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Richard
• Re: VSAM Error Code 04
  • From: Clark F Morris
• VSAM Error Code 04
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Alistair
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Alistair
• Re: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Robin Lee
• Re: problem w/READ INTO in COBOL/VSE?
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: problem w/READ INTO in COBOL/VSE?
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From:
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: Alistair
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: Clark F Morris
• Re: problem w/READ INTO in COBOL/VSE?
  • From: Richard
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From:
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From:
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From:
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From:
• Re: OT: Job References; are they any real value?
  • From:
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Richard
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Job References; are they any real value?
  • From: Marty
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Richard
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Richard
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Robin Lee
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Robin Lee
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: Alistair
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: Alistair
• Re: problem w/READ INTO in COBOL/VSE?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Donald Tees
• Re: Job References; are they any real value?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: Binyamin Dissen
• Re: problem w/READ INTO in COBOL/VSE?
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: SkippyPB
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: Job References; are they any real value?
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: Job References; are they any real value?
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From:
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From:
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From:
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From:
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From:
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From:
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: some
• OT: Job References; are they any real value?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: some
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: some
• Re: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Richard
• Re: problem w/READ INTO in COBOL/VSE?
  • From: Richard
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Robin Lee
• Re: problem w/READ INTO in COBOL/VSE?
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: problem w/READ INTO in COBOL/VSE?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: problem w/READ INTO in COBOL/VSE?
  • From: Robert Jones
• Re: problem w/READ INTO in COBOL/VSE?
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Robin Lee
• Re: problem w/READ INTO in COBOL/VSE?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• Re: problem w/READ INTO in COBOL/VSE?
  • From: Howard Brazee
• problem w/READ INTO in COBOL/VSE?
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From:
• OT: windoze woes and full rant mode is on
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From:
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: some
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: some
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From:
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: some
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: Robin Lee
• Re: Development and offshoring was Re: IBM file status 97 (was: Prodcuing an output file onlyonFriday?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: some
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: William M. Klein
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From:
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: some
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From:
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: Richard
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Single Source CICS/Batch
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: advice on books to learn cobol
  • From: some
• Re: Development and offshoring was Re: IBM file status 97 (was: Prodcuing an output file onlyonFriday?
  • From:
• Re: Development and offshoring was Re: IBM file status 97 (was: Prodcuing an output file onlyonFriday?
  • From: Alistair
• Re: Development and offshoring was Re: IBM file status 97 (was: Prodcuing an output file onlyonFriday?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Development and offshoring was Re: IBM file status 97 (was: Prodcuing an output file onlyonFriday?
  • From:
• Re: Development and offshoring was Re: IBM file status 97 (was: Prodcuing an output file onlyonFriday?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Development and offshoring was Re: IBM file status 97 (was: Prodcuing an output file onlyonFriday?
  • From: Pete Dashwood
• Re: Single Source CICS/Batch
  • From: Charles Hottel
• Re: Single Source CICS/Batch
  • From: Frank Swarbrick
• Re: 173 Called program not found in drive/directory
  • From: Vaclav Snajdr

• Security
• UNIX
• Linux
• Coding
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint