Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?

In article <12m6h4gc23envb0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
HeyBub <heybubNOSPAM@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
docdwarf@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
This is a very good insight.

I can't say it is original... but I've had it for so long that I don't
know where I found it.

Then it's possible you read about it in a book by Robert Heinlein.

It's also possible that I've never read about anything worth quoting here
in a book by Robert Heinlein... but the world is just full of
possibilities.



I've noticed similar things a few other places and not limited to
interactions between the sexes... but maybe that's only because one
may find what one looks for.

It is, in most places, unlawful to try and determine whether the subject
action is an interaction between the sexes or whether you are, in fact,
monitoring an intra-sex interaction.

Like many Americans I try to remember my country's Revolutionary
Inception; this may allow for the lawfulness of an action to be seen in a
slightly different light.

To be blunt, don't lift the skirt. No,
best to go with the first impression and not seek confirmation.

Tune in next week when the lesson is... Pay No Attention to that Man
Behind the Curtain.

DD

.