Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
- From: docdwarf@xxxxxxxxx ()
- Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 02:03:57 +0000 (UTC)
In article <4shgvlFujbolU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Pete Dashwood <dashwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<docdwarf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:ejutdj$nbl$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[snip]
Of that I am not certain, Mr Maclean; at first blush it seems aLOL! Excellent stuff, Doc...
Goedel-tightening stretch, since Zen is not bound by the Aristotelean
Principle of Non-Contradiction while Russell would seem to be thusly
constrained.
Pfoo... you'se jes' easily amused. Perhaps some time might be spent
pondering the various borders between the esoteric and the idiosyncratic.
DD
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
- From: Clark F Morris
- Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
- From: Alistair
- Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
- From:
- Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
- Prev by Date: Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
- Next by Date: Re: [OT] Rather Polite of Him, Wouldn't You Say?
- Previous by thread: Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
- Next by thread: Re: CICS and COBOL reentrancy was Re: Further discussion on "Something has to be maintained" and lack of OO acceptance.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
