Re: Need for COBOL 64 bit on mainframe

From: "Michael Mattias" <mmattias@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 15:29:02 GMT

Wouldn't it be true - generically speaking - that there is nothing that
can't be done with "less than 64-bit" technology, it's just that certain
things - and perhaps many things - could be done much faster and/or
'cleaner' WITH 64-bit technology? (e.g., 31 decimal digit arithmetic).

--
Michael C. Mattias
Tal Systems Inc.
Racine WI

.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Need for COBOL 64 bit on mainframe
  - From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: Need for COBOL 64 bit on mainframe
  - From: William M. Klein

References:
- OT: Newsgroup Name Change?
  - From: Alistair
- Re: OT: Newsgroup Name Change?
  - From: CG
- Re: OT: Newsgroup Name Change?
  - From: Clark F Morris
- Re: OT: Newsgroup Name Change?
  - From: CG
- Need for COBOL 64 bit on mainframe
  - From: CG
- Re: Need for COBOL 64 bit on mainframe
  - From: Clark F Morris

Prev by Date: Re: Need for COBOL 64 bit on mainframe
Next by Date: Re: IBM Mainframe - Batch Job to Generate Data Set List?
Previous by thread: Re: Need for COBOL 64 bit on mainframe
Next by thread: Re: Need for COBOL 64 bit on mainframe
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread