Re: Reset data
- From: Howard Brazee <howard@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 08:11:36 -0700
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:26:16 +1300, "Pete Dashwood"
<dashwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
How would the result of doing that (taking twice as much storage as you
actually need, and running the risk of forgetting to update one of the
tables when the structure changes) differ from...
INITIALIZE TABELLE ?
We have more control, for instance if your table has redefines,
delimiters (within fillers), or if the initialized data are variable
from run to run (or from copybook program to copybook program). It
can also be used if your table is in the linkage division.
It's also quicker, although that isn't as important these days.
We have initialized database records as well - calc into a record with
a key of space to pull out the standard *empty* database record,
before creating a new one to add. This can be changed on the fly.
.
- References:
- Reset data
- From: Mitch Steens
- Re: Reset data
- From: Howard Brazee
- Re: Reset data
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Reset data
- Prev by Date: Re: Reset data
- Next by Date: Re: Reset data
- Previous by thread: Re: Reset data
- Next by thread: Acucobol and DB2
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
