Re: New "base document" available


"William M. Klein" <wmklein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:EW%Oh.38524$lD4.23088@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I asked about the May date and was told that it was just a typo. However,
it wasn't felt "important enough" to reissue the document.


Fair enough.

Maybe they could add it to the list of things that ARE important enough, and
kill a flock of birds with one stone?

Hey, they might even consider a FUNCTION COMMAND-LINE... at the same time
they fix the date. Convene a meeting in Florida or Disneyland or Las Vegas
and really give these matters the attention they deserve...:-) Both of them
are 10 minute decisions, but I'm sure that can be dragged out for a day or
two.

Play your cards right, there might even be an award in it. (Of course you
need to be REALLY late to get an award, but I'm sure J4 are working on
it...)

There's precedent enough...

Pete.


.