Re: Conversion of data & associated logic from ISAM to RDB
- From: docdwarf@xxxxxxxxx ()
- Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 18:25:41 +0000 (UTC)
In article <1176138034.214060.257610@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
DaveM <renfrew76@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Mr Dworf,
Please... jes' ol' Doc, if you can manage to spell that correctly.
Hindsight being 20-20, our archival research would have yielded much
better results had we known to search for the term "embedded sql".
Had you bothered to heed my earlier mention about our admitted
starting place of ignorance then you would have already figured out
that it can be quite difficult to ask for something when you don't
even know what it is really supposed to be called in the first
place.
The responsibility for knowing where one is going and how to request such
a thing is that of the traveller... knowing neither where one wishes to
end up nor how to request information about it may, indeed, result in
one's getting lost.
Speaking of my own ignorance, I really should have thought to check
your track record before I responded to you the first time.
You might have checked other things as well... there's an Olde Joke you
might have stumbled across, say, at
http://www.dotnetspider.com/fun/Computer-Joke-838.aspx .
DD
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Conversion of data & associated logic from ISAM to RDB
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: Conversion of data & associated logic from ISAM to RDB
- From: Howard Brazee
- Re: Conversion of data & associated logic from ISAM to RDB
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: DATA MANIPULATION TEXT TO SIGNED NUMERIC RM COBOL
- Next by Date: Re: Conversion of data & associated logic from ISAM to RDB
- Previous by thread: Re: Conversion of data & associated logic from ISAM to RDB
- Next by thread: Re: Conversion of data & associated logic from ISAM to RDB
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
