Re: newbie question on cobol syntax
- From: Howard Brazee <howard@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 08:45:50 -0600
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:20:50 -0600, LX-i <lxi0007@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It does. That is, the Cobol standard does avoid such tricks and
specifies that the above does not comply. It is only some vendors that
allow such tricks.
I was thinking that it was forbidden per the standard. I guess I
haven't been out of the scene for that long... :)
Which is why in my first message of the thread mentioning this
possibility, I said:
Some compilers will allow.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: newbie question on cobol syntax
- From: LX-i
- Re: newbie question on cobol syntax
- References:
- newbie question on cobol syntax
- From: Mayer
- Re: newbie question on cobol syntax
- From: William M. Klein
- Re: newbie question on cobol syntax
- From: Howard Brazee
- Re: newbie question on cobol syntax
- From: William M. Klein
- Re: newbie question on cobol syntax
- From: Howard Brazee
- Re: newbie question on cobol syntax
- From: Richard
- Re: newbie question on cobol syntax
- From: LX-i
- newbie question on cobol syntax
- Prev by Date: PLUG: txt2pdf 9.4
- Next by Date: Re: AcuODBC Question
- Previous by thread: Re: newbie question on cobol syntax
- Next by thread: Re: newbie question on cobol syntax
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|