Re: OT: Military Ranks/Computers : WAS Re: newbie question on cobol syntax
- From: Howard Brazee <howard@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 12:03:49 -0600
On 30 Apr 2007 10:34:00 -0700, Alistair
<alistair@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<blood boiling mode>
And I presume that the good-ole US of A has not ever nor does it now
sponsor terrorism? Need I remind you of arms to Iran or of the
Contras? How about the continued support for the IRA and the
inconsistent support for the NI peace process ?
</blood boiling mode>
You know that virtually every politician defines "terrorism" as what
the other guys do. Look at all the two-bit dictators who call their
revolutionaries by that "in" term now.
In the first half of the U.S.'s history, they almost always sided with
the "freedom fighters" - the revolutionaries. The last half, the
U.S. was a big guy, and has sided with the establishment, unless that
revolution was against an established enemy.
.
- References:
- Re: newbie question on cobol syntax
- From: Howard Brazee
- Re: newbie question on cobol syntax
- From: LX-i
- Re: newbie question on cobol syntax
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: newbie question on cobol syntax
- From: LX-i
- Re: OT: Military Ranks/Computers : WAS Re: newbie question on cobol syntax
- From: Alistair
- Re: newbie question on cobol syntax
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: Military Ranks/Computers : WAS Re: newbie question on cobol syntax
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: Military Ranks/Computers : WAS Re: newbie question on cobol syntax
- Next by thread: Re: newbie question on cobol syntax
- Index(es):