Re: Stop Run vs GoBack

On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 10:02:53 +1200, "Pete Dashwood"
<dashwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

...or even use STOP RUN in main programs and GOBACK in called ones, in the
certain knowledge that your code will then behave correctly on any COBOL
platform, including PCs, and that you have complied with the "spirit" of
COBOL in making your code semantically accurate. (People for whom IBM is the
World, may see it differently.)

The semantically inaccurate command that bothers me (but which is
useful with some compilers), is PERFORM ABEND-ROUTINE.

I ain't coming back.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Stop Run vs GoBack
    ... platform, including PCs, and that you have complied with the "spirit" of ... COBOL in making your code semantically accurate. ... to the top of the current paragraph. ...
    (comp.lang.cobol)
  • Re: Stop Run vs GoBack
    ... platform, including PCs, and that you have complied with the "spirit" of ... COBOL in making your code semantically accurate. ... to the top of the current paragraph. ...
    (comp.lang.cobol)
  • Re: Stop Run vs GoBack
    ... platform, including PCs, and that you have complied with the "spirit" of ... COBOL in making your code semantically accurate. ... Of course the ABEND module did not ...
    (comp.lang.cobol)
  • Re: The Value of a CS Degree
    ... Pre 1980 was a long time ago before PCs and the choices were Fortran, ... Cobol or Pascal. ... Sounds like your ignorance suck:) ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: COBOL compiler
    ... >> large commercial apps, COBOL is far and away the best tool for the job. ... were being migrated onto PCs. ... powerful intrinsic SORT verb. ...
    (Debian-User)