Re: Stop Run vs GoBack



On 6/25/2007 at 9:49 AM, in message <f5oo68$6jl$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
<docdwarf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <l8nv73lbaajgladcst6hno6cetau466h18@xxxxxxx>,
Howard Brazee <howard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 10:02:53 +1200, "Pete Dashwood"
<dashwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

...or even use STOP RUN in main programs and GOBACK in called ones, in
the
certain knowledge that your code will then behave correctly on any COBOL

platform, including PCs, and that you have complied with the "spirit" of

COBOL in making your code semantically accurate. (People for whom IBM is

the
World, may see it differently.)

The semantically inaccurate command that bothers me (but which is
useful with some compilers), is PERFORM ABEND-ROUTINE.

I ain't coming back.

This might be a reason for the Third Permissible GO TO.

First Permissible: to the bottom (-EXIT) for the present paragraph.
Second Permissible: to the top (PARA-NAME) of the current paragraph.
Third Permissible: to the ABEND routine.

Doc! No! Please don't start this thread up!
(Everyone please avert your eyes!)

Frank
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: R: GOBACK (was: Perform Thru/Go to vs. Perform - Compile Speed
    ... >> one paragraph name to ENTRY, or breaking the program into smaller ones. ... >> what it looks like in the multithreading demo I just posted. ... All compilers will have the equivalent of reentrant, ... not sharing memory with other threads. ...
    (comp.lang.cobol)
  • Re: Infinite Loops and Explicit Exits
    ... >> The only hardware change was the addition of stack. ... And in machines of my experience that was in the EXIT ... The EXIT in its own paragraph was part of the language ... Poorly optimized early compilers generated conditional exit ...
    (comp.lang.cobol)
  • Re: Branch Prediction and Interpreter Speed
    ... It is incumbent upon SRFI-77 to justify its ... > approach versus type declarations, ... That first paragraph is moderately interesting. ... Speedups that are achievable only by compilers are not ...
    (comp.lang.scheme)
  • Re: The Law of the Excluded Middle again (long)
    ... Nothing at all bothers ... according to constructivists such as Keith Ramsay and galathaea, ... The whole paragraph was a paraphrase of what I have been told ... but I think you should also apologise for not ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Cobol language dictionary page -- assignment complete?
    ... > I'm really kind of surprised that neither of your cited compilers seem to ... > notice that COBOL itself requires both a SELECT and an FD in order fully ... > once and only once as file-name in the FILE-CONTROL paragraph. ... Does this skeleton program include ...
    (comp.lang.cobol)