Re: Stop Run vs GoBack
- From: "Charles Hottel" <chottel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 00:55:30 GMT
"Howard Brazee" <howard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:l8nv73lbaajgladcst6hno6cetau466h18@xxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 10:02:53 +1200, "Pete Dashwood"
<dashwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
...or even use STOP RUN in main programs and GOBACK in called ones, in the
certain knowledge that your code will then behave correctly on any COBOL
platform, including PCs, and that you have complied with the "spirit" of
COBOL in making your code semantically accurate. (People for whom IBM is
the
World, may see it differently.)
The semantically inaccurate command that bothers me (but which is
useful with some compilers), is PERFORM ABEND-ROUTINE.
I ain't coming back.
One place I worked used CALL 'ABEND'. Of course the ABEND module did not
exist.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Stop Run vs GoBack
- From: Howard Brazee
- Re: Stop Run vs GoBack
- References:
- Stop Run vs GoBack
- From: William M. Klein
- Re: Stop Run vs GoBack
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: Stop Run vs GoBack
- From: Howard Brazee
- Stop Run vs GoBack
- Prev by Date: Re: Stop Run vs GoBack
- Next by Date: Re: COBOL record length on z/series
- Previous by thread: Re: Stop Run vs GoBack
- Next by thread: Re: Stop Run vs GoBack
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
