Re: Stop Run vs GoBack
- From: Howard Brazee <howard@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 07:46:47 -0600
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 00:55:30 GMT, "Charles Hottel"
<chottel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
One place I worked used CALL 'ABEND'. Of course the ABEND module did not
exist.
That's funny.
We have a program that has a purpose of abending. It is called when
EasyTrieve programs return abending return codes. We also have an
old standard abending routine that creates a SOC9.
My opinion is if they want to disguise the abend, use the standard IBM
'CEE3ABC'. Or better yet, use return codes.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Stop Run vs GoBack
- From: Charles Hottel
- Re: Stop Run vs GoBack
- References:
- Stop Run vs GoBack
- From: William M. Klein
- Re: Stop Run vs GoBack
- From: Pete Dashwood
- Re: Stop Run vs GoBack
- From: Howard Brazee
- Re: Stop Run vs GoBack
- From: Charles Hottel
- Stop Run vs GoBack
- Prev by Date: Re: Stop Run vs GoBack
- Next by Date: Re: COBOL record length on z/series
- Previous by thread: Re: Stop Run vs GoBack
- Next by thread: Re: Stop Run vs GoBack
- Index(es):